Hello,
> For better or worse the term ASLR is today in common use to refer to a
> number of different approaches. Using what has become a generic term
> allows the implementation to change in the future, without changing
> the interface (e.g. sysctls, userland tools, etc.).
If I'm not mistaken, A
On 18 January 2017 at 17:56, Piotr Kubaj wrote:
> It should also be stated properly that this patch doesn't implement ASLR, but
> ASR.
For better or worse the term ASLR is today in common use to refer to a
number of different approaches. Using what has become a generic term
allows the implementa
It should also be stated properly that this patch doesn't implement ASLR, but
ASR.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 9:53 AM, Johannes Lundberg wrote:
> Hi
>
> What is the status of ASLR?
>
> https://reviews.freebsd.org/D5603
>
> The thread has been silent for a couple of months. I'm happy to test if
> needed.
Hi Johannes,
I think we were waiting on some review, but if that has stalled
