RE: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-20 Thread Alex Ayala
Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jesse Guardiani Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 11:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Things I would like to improve upon: > --

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-20 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Things I would like to improve upon: > > 1.) I need to find some way to automatically kill any processes that are > using (or have opened) the /dev/acd0 device BEFORE executing apm -z > from /etc/rc.suspend. OK. The following

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-20 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Jesse Guardiani wrote: > >> Jesse Guardiani wrote: >> >>> Darryl Okahata wrote: >>> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> [...] >> >>> Now, if I can just get that lousy CD-ROM to not crash my system on >>> resume I'll be a VERY happy man... I did som

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Jesse Guardiani wrote: > >> Darryl Okahata wrote: >> >>> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [...] > >> Now, if I can just get that lousy CD-ROM to not crash my system on >> resume I'll be a VERY happy man... > > > Well, I'm getting a bit closer now. > >

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Darryl Okahata wrote: > >> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Now, if I can just get that lousy CD-ROM to not crash my system on > resume I'll be a VERY happy man... Well, I'm getting a bit closer now. I rebooted and reinstalled the CD drive, then I e

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Darryl Okahata wrote: > Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> 1.) When in X Windows (this never happened in Linux. What gives?) > > Another WAG: have you tried this kernel option?: > > options SC_NO_SUSPEND_VTYSWITCH > > It prevented X11 from crashing my A31 (but didn't he

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Darryl Okahata
Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 1.) When in X Windows (this never happened in Linux. What gives?) Another WAG: have you tried this kernel option?: options SC_NO_SUSPEND_VTYSWITCH It prevented X11 from crashing my A31 (but didn't help with the display corruption). --

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Darryl Okahata wrote: > Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >Is there any way to disable the ata1-slave? BIOS? I looked. No BIOS config options for ATA devices whatsoever. This is probably because I'm using an IBM Thinkpad with an Ultrabay 2000 (containing a floppy drive current

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Tobias Roth wrote: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:23:09PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: >> On (2003/06/19 20:06), Tobias Roth wrote: >> >> > you compare a stable linux kernel branch with an unstable freebsd >> > branch. please make yourself familiar with freebsds (and possibly >> > linux') release pr

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Tobias Roth
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 08:23:09PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > On (2003/06/19 20:06), Tobias Roth wrote: > > > you compare a stable linux kernel branch with an unstable freebsd branch. > > please make yourself familiar with freebsds (and possibly linux') release > > process before you make state

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On (2003/06/19 20:06), Tobias Roth wrote: > you compare a stable linux kernel branch with an unstable freebsd branch. > please make yourself familiar with freebsds (and possibly linux') release > process before you make statements like this. you will only piss off the > people that are trying to h

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Tobias Roth
On Thu, Jun 19, 2003 at 01:48:18PM -0400, Jesse Guardiani wrote: > > First off, I'd like to note, once again, that APM works PERFECTLY under > Linux on this laptop with a 2.4.18 and 2.4.20 kernel. I could even suspend > and resume from X Windows without problems. FreeBSD's APM code must not > be a

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Jesse Guardiani wrote: > Darryl Okahata wrote: > >> Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Help! This APM BIOS suspends fine under Linux (2.4.18 >>> kernel)! I've tried everything I can think of to >>> get suspend working under 5.1-RELEASE! >> >> Wild-a** guess: >> >>> ata1-sla

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-19 Thread Jesse Guardiani
Darryl Okahata wrote: > Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Help! This APM BIOS suspends fine under Linux (2.4.18 >> kernel)! I've tried everything I can think of to >> get suspend working under 5.1-RELEASE! > > Wild-a** guess: > >> ata1-slave: timeout waiting for interrupt >>

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-18 Thread Kevin Oberman
One thing that jumps out at me on my T30 is that when I issue the S3, the disk spins down instantly. Under APM it takes several seconds and under Windows XP it also pauses bor a few (maybe 4) seconds. I suspect it is powering down the disk as soon as the S3 is issued and the write cache is never g

Re: APM problem in 5.1-RELEASE

2003-06-18 Thread Darryl Okahata
Jesse Guardiani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Help! This APM BIOS suspends fine under Linux (2.4.18 > kernel)! I've tried everything I can think of to > get suspend working under 5.1-RELEASE! Wild-a** guess: > ata1-slave: timeout waiting for interrupt > ata1-slave: ATAPI identify failed