On 13-Nov-2003 Doug White wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote:
>
>> "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> > > However, if NO_MIXED_MODE works, that is actually the more desirable
>> > > way to run your system.
>> > How common is the need for this? Do
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003, Dag-Erling [iso-8859-1] Smørgrav wrote:
> "Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > However, if NO_MIXED_MODE works, that is actually the more desirable
> > > way to run your system.
> > How common is the need for this? Does turning of mixed mode when it's
> > not
"Matthew D. Fuller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > However, if NO_MIXED_MODE works, that is actually the more desirable
> > way to run your system.
> How common is the need for this? Does turning of mixed mode when it's
> not needed give any real advantages higher up?
NO_MIXED_MODE disables a ha
I, for one, am always pleased to see these sort of in-depth explanations
of these sort of shims.
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 11:35:26AM -0500 I heard the voice of
John Baldwin, and lo! it spake thus:
>
> It's documented in /sys/i386/conf/NOTES now along with 'device apic'. For
> a longer explanation
On 11-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> On Monday 10 November 2003 19:33, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On 08-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> > On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >> On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
>> >> > Hello,
>> >> >
>> >> > I have one repr
On Monday 10 November 2003 19:33, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 08-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> >> > Hello,
> >> >
> >> > I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabl
On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabling
> > "device apic" in the kernel.
> > While building OpenOffice about 1 1/2 hours after start the system
> > re
On Thursday 06 November 2003 17:33, John Baldwin wrote:
> On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
*SCHNIP*
> > Nov 5 13:41:40 cale kernel: processor eflags = interrupt enabled, IOPL
> > = 0 Nov 5 13:41:40 cale kernel: current process= 26 (irq16:
> > nvidia0) Nov 5 13:41:40 cale k
On 06-Nov-2003 Harald Schmalzbauer wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have one reproducable panic with sources from 04. Nov when enabling "device
> apic" in the kernel.
> While building OpenOffice about 1 1/2 hours after start the system reboots.
> This is absolutely reproducable. Removing device apic from
