On Thursday, May 24, 2012 2:15:26 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>
> Now that you committed the acpi_cpu fix I'd like to do the easy part -
> protection from the problem in the future.
> Does the following look OK?
>
> Index: sys/kern/subr_bus.c
> =
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:33:56 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 17/05/2012 17:05 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Oh, whoops. Actually, the right way to do this I think is
> >> bus_hint_device_unit()
> >> (and/or, not make the unit
On Thursday, May 17, 2012 11:33:56 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 17/05/2012 17:05 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Oh, whoops. Actually, the right way to do this I think is
> >> bus_hint_device_unit()
> >> (and/or, not make the unit
on 17/05/2012 17:05 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
>> Oh, whoops. Actually, the right way to do this I think is
>> bus_hint_device_unit()
>> (and/or, not make the unit number in cpuX mean anything at all, but use a
>> separate
>> ivar
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 4:07:43 pm John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:18:25 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > on 16/05/2012 17:50 John Baldwin said the following:
> > > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> > >> Not sure what you disagree with...
> > >> First, the
On Wednesday, May 16, 2012 12:18:25 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 16/05/2012 17:50 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> Not sure what you disagree with...
> >> First, the wildcard device is added to the child list during the walk.
> >> The
on 16/05/2012 17:50 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Not sure what you disagree with...
>> First, the wildcard device is added to the child list during the walk.
>> Then, the unit 0 device is added to the list when acpi_timer identify is
On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 12:35:12 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 15/05/2012 17:34 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
> >>> On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> Can you produce a
on 15/05/2012 17:34 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
>>> On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have
a
>
On Monday, May 14, 2012 12:41:37 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
> > On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have
> >> a
> >> suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r
on 14/05/2012 01:43 Bruce Cran said the following:
> On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I have a
>> suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r231161.
>
> acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
> acpi0:
On 13/05/2012 21:06, Andriy Gapon wrote:
Can you produce an equivalent snippet with verbose logging enabled? I
have a suspicion that these messages are a byproduct from r231161.
acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
acpi0: reservation of 1000
on 13/05/2012 11:39 Bruce Cran said the following:
> I've just updated to -current and noticed the following errors in dmesg:
>
> acpi0: on motherboard
> acpi0: Power Button (fixed)
> acpi0: reservation of fee0, 1000 (3) failed
> acpi0: reservation of 0, a (3) failed
> acpi0: reservation
13 matches
Mail list logo
