Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <4478.927463...@axl.noc.iafrica.com>, Sheldon Hearn writes: > > >On Sun, 23 May 1999 11:32:27 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >> Can somebody please try if this fixes MFS ? > >Do you want your patch applied alongside Luoqi Chen's patch to >kern_conf.c from last week? I've been able to

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-23 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Sun, 23 May 1999 11:32:27 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > Can somebody please try if this fixes MFS ? Do you want your patch applied alongside Luoqi Chen's patch to kern_conf.c from last week? I've been able to mount_mfs without problems since then. Ciao, Sheldon/ To Unsubscribe: send m

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-23 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Can somebody please try if this fixes MFS ? Poul-Henning Index: ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c === RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/ufs/mfs/mfs_vfsops.c,v retrieving revision 1.63 diff -u -r1.63 mfs_vfsops.c --- mfs_vfsops.c1999/05/14 20:

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-19 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 19 May 1999 17:40:50 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > so you must be using the old wd driver. The old wd_driver's d_dump > only returns ENXIO when the drive doesn't exist or has never been > opened or is not labeled. I'm using the "old" wd driver (controller wdc in CURRENT). The disk is lab

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-19 Thread Bruce Evans
>> >dumping to dev (0, 131089), offset 524288 >> >dump device bad >> >> The dev_t changes obfuscated it by printing it in %d format instead of >> as part of the dev number in [0x]%x format. > >So you reckon that whatever problem is making it imp[ossible for me to >take dumps, it was present before

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-19 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 19 May 1999 12:04:54 +1000, Bruce Evans wrote: > >dumping to dev (0, 131089), offset 524288 > >dump device bad > > The dev_t changes obfuscated it by printing it in %d format instead of > as part of the dev number in [0x]%x format. So you reckon that whatever problem is making it imp[o

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-18 Thread Bruce Evans
>I think I know why a lot of people _aren't_ seeing this panic: it >doesn't show up if you #undef DEVT_FASCIST in kern/kern_conf.c . #undef DEVT_FASICIST weakens tthe error detection. >I found this by accident because I can't get a crash dump using the wd >driver. I get > >dumping to dev (0, 131

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-18 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 18 May 1999 08:53:49 +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > I remade world and kernel (config -g -r) with yesterday's HEAD and still > get a panic mounting MFS. My kernel config includes MFS but not > MFS_ROOT. > > Shout if you want a trace. I haven't provided one here, since I'll need > to copy

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-17 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Mon, 17 May 1999 13:02:29 -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote: > Are you sure you have the latest -current? I committed a fix Friday > night. Hi Luoqi, I remade world and kernel (config -g -r) with yesterday's HEAD and still get a panic mounting MFS. My kernel config includes MFS but not MFS_ROOT. Sho

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-17 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 03:37:36PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote: > If you don't have `options MFS' in your config file, you will need to > recompile the mfs kld module. I know, I did that this evening (did a make world/kernel rebuild around 8pm CEST): -r-xr-xr-x 1 root wheel 12874 May 17 21:20 mfs

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-17 Thread Luoqi Chen
> On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 01:02:29PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote: > > Are you sure you have the latest -current? I committed a fix Friday night. > > I'm quite positive, because I experimented with a fresh -current/kernel > yesterday. Changing NUMCDEV from 256 to 255 in kern_conf.c fixes the problem >

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-17 Thread Jos Backus
On Mon, May 17, 1999 at 01:02:29PM -0400, Luoqi Chen wrote: > Are you sure you have the latest -current? I committed a fix Friday night. I'm quite positive, because I experimented with a fresh -current/kernel yesterday. Changing NUMCDEV from 256 to 255 in kern_conf.c fixes the problem though. I'm

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-17 Thread Luoqi Chen
> With todays -current, mounting /tmp using > swap /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,-s=32768 0 0 > yields a > Are you sure you have the latest -current? I committed a fix Friday night. -lq To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-16 Thread Jos Backus
On Sun, May 16, 1999 at 01:36:44PM -0700, Doug White wrote: > I've been getting this for a week now. :( Luoqui Chen suggested bumping > NUMCDEV in src/sys/kern/kern_conf.c to 255 to get around it, and a couple > of people had success, including myself. I'll do that then. Thanks! Groetjes, -- J

Re: MFS still hosed

1999-05-16 Thread Doug White
On Sun, 16 May 1999, Jos Backus wrote: > With todays -current, mounting /tmp using > swap /tmp mfs rw,nosuid,nodev,-s=32768 0 0 > yields a > > Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode > fault virtual address= 0x9d203590 I've been getting this for a week now. :( Luoqui Chen suggested b