-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 01/01/14 15:25, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2014-01-01 21:18:04 - tinderbox 2.20 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2014-01-01 21:18:04 - FreeBSD
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0:
> Mon Mar 26 1
Oops, sorry, I'm wearing the pointy hat. Forgot about the diagnostic
that does printf().
rick
- Original Message -
> TB --- 2013-06-22 16:51:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2013-06-22 16:51:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD
This is being worked on... There are some casting issues that are
causing problems on 32-bit systems, which are not causing errors on
64-bit systems.
Glen
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 06:57:57AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> [...]
pgpg5oEomNKIO.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Feb 16, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> FreeBSD Tinderbox writes:
>> cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns -std=gnu99
>> -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
>> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
>> -Wp
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes:
> cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns -std=gnu99
> -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W
> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes
> -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c
> /src/lib/
Got bit by compiler not warning on some things.
Working on a fix.
-Alfred
On 12/10/12 10:36 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE
FreeBSD 8.3-PR
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:04 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> cc -O2 -pipe -DLIBC_SCCS -DINET6 -I/src/lib/libutil
> -I/src/lib/libutil/../libc/gen/ -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers
> -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes
> -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpoi
On 25. Dec 2011, at 11:42 , Justin Hibbits wrote:
>>> Sorry about this, bad patch when I tested the build. I'll fix it tomorrow
>>> when I get time.
>>
>>
>> Something like this?
>>
>> Andreas
>>
>> Index: hwpmc_powerpc.c
>> ===
>
On Dec 25, 2011 5:27 AM, "Andreas Tobler" wrote:
>
> On 25.12.11 00:59, Justin Hibbits wrote:
>>
>> On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox"
wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
>>
>> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
>>>
>>> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting H
On 25.12.11 00:59, Justin Hibbits wrote:
On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote:
TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for
powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - cleaning
On 2011-12-24 19:21, Marius Strobl wrote:
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:43:51PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
...
TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
...
stage 4.4: buildi
On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote:
>
> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for
powerpc64/powerpc
> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:43:51PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
> TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - tinderbox 2.8 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
> TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2
* FreeBSD Tinderbox , 2006 20:28:
> atrun.o:(.got+0x28): undefined reference to `effective_uid'
> atrun.o:(.got+0x30): undefined reference to `effective_gid'
> atrun.o:(.got+0x40): undefined reference to `real_gid'
> atrun.o:(.got+0x48): undefined reference to `real_uid'
Sorry about that. Shou
[Picking a random tinderbox mail]
As I've broken the powerpc64 build a couple of days ago, I was amazed
that none of these emails went to my Inbox. Whenever the ports' INDEX
build is broken, there's a list of committers that are most likely to
blame for it. I would welcome the same type of emails
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Robert Watson wrote:
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I think Tinderbox has a bad source tree. Lines 557 and 569 make sense
from the old version of kern_fail.c before either of my commits. So is
Tinderbox somehow building with an old kern_fail.c but an updated
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
I think Tinderbox has a bad source tree. Lines 557 and 569 make sense from
the old version of kern_fail.c before either of my commits. So is
Tinderbox somehow building with an old kern_fail.c but an updated
sys/fail.h? That would explain the build er
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote:
On 12/21/2010 5:49 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote:
/src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
/src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type
/src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing
On 12/21/2010 5:49 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote:
>> /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete
>> type
>> /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete
>> type
>> /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete
>>
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:37 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox
wrote:
> TB --- 2010-12-21 20:56:55 - tinderbox 2.6 running on
> freebsd-current.sentex.ca
> TB --- 2010-12-21 20:56:55 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
> TB --- 2010-12-21 20:56:55 - cleaning the object tree
> TB --- 2010-12-2
At 07:29 PM 8/29/2010, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
Is something wrong with cvsup? This bug was fixed two days ago in SVN.
Hi,
There was a problem with the crontab entry on the local cvsup mirror
that the tinder box syncs from for weekend runs / updates. I have
fixed the ctab entry and kicked cvs
On 08/29/10 18:23, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote:
TB --- 2010-08-29 22:54:57 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca
TB --- 2010-08-29 22:54:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc
TB --- 2010-08-29 22:54:57 - cleaning the object tree
TB --- 2010-08-29 22:55:09 - cvsupping t
On 08/22/10 07:10, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
I'm not sure I understand what you mean (or rather, how it would
help the tinderbox). What *would* help would be an easy way to
determine, *before* trying to build it, whether a speci
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes:
> > I'm not sure I understand what you mean (or rather, how it would
> > help the tinderbox). What *would* help would be an easy way to
> > determine, *before* trying to build it, whether a specific kernel
> > config is appropriate for a spe
On 08/21/10 16:54, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
I'm the first to admit that many of the config tricks involved in this
port, and GENERIC64, are ugly hacks, largely because config(8) was not
designed with such things in mind.
It's not just "config tricks and ugl
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> I'm the first to admit that many of the config tricks involved in this
> port, and GENERIC64, are ugly hacks, largely because config(8) was not
> designed with such things in mind.
It's not just "config tricks and ugly hacks", it also violates the
assumption that target
On 08/20/10 14:20, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
Next up: tinderbox needs to build GENERIC64, not GENERIC, on
powerpc64. make buildkernel is programmed to do the right thing is you
don't pass a KERNCONF, but tinderbox apparently passes GENERIC
explicitly. This one's in
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> Next up: tinderbox needs to build GENERIC64, not GENERIC, on
> powerpc64. make buildkernel is programmed to do the right thing is you
> don't pass a KERNCONF, but tinderbox apparently passes GENERIC
> explicitly. This one's in your court!
There is no way to fix this wit
On 08/20/10 04:26, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
The problem is that until yesterday, you could not build a powerpc64
LINT, and so it was trying to build a PPC32 kernel with a 64-bit
toolchain. An actual powerpc64 kernel does not include
ofw_standard.c. This should be
Nathan Whitehorn writes:
> The problem is that until yesterday, you could not build a powerpc64
> LINT, and so it was trying to build a PPC32 kernel with a 64-bit
> toolchain. An actual powerpc64 kernel does not include
> ofw_standard.c. This should be fixed now with r211483, so long as the
> LINT
On 08/19/10 01:40, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes:
Kernel build for LINT started on Thu Aug 19 02:51:08 UTC 2010
stage 1: configuring the kernel
stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
stage 2.3: build tools
stage 3.1: making depende
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes:
Kernel build for LINT started on Thu Aug 19 02:51:08 UTC 2010
stage 1: configuring the kernel
stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree
stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree
stage 2.3: build tools
stage 3.1: making dependencies
stage 3.2: b
32 matches
Mail list logo