Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2014-01-01 Thread Xin Li
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 01/01/14 15:25, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2014-01-01 21:18:04 - tinderbox 2.20 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2014-01-01 21:18:04 - FreeBSD > freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PRERELEASE #0: > Mon Mar 26 1

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-06-22 Thread Rick Macklem
Oops, sorry, I'm wearing the pointy hat. Forgot about the diagnostic that does printf(). rick - Original Message - > TB --- 2013-06-22 16:51:33 - tinderbox 2.10 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2013-06-22 16:51:33 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca > 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-03-24 Thread Glen Barber
This is being worked on... There are some casting issues that are causing problems on 32-bit systems, which are not causing errors on 64-bit systems. Glen On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 06:57:57AM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > [...] pgpg5oEomNKIO.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-02-17 Thread Marcel Moolenaar
On Feb 16, 2013, at 2:05 PM, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: >> cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns -std=gnu99 >> -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W >> -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes >> -Wp

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2013-02-16 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: > cc -O2 -pipe -I/src/lib/libldns/../../contrib/ldns -std=gnu99 > -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W > -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes > -Wpointer-arith -Wno-uninitialized -Wno-pointer-sign -c > /src/lib/

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-12-10 Thread Alfred Perlstein
Got bit by compiler not warning on some things. Working on a fix. -Alfred On 12/10/12 10:36 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - tinderbox 2.9 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2012-12-11 03:32:04 - FreeBSD freebsd-current.sentex.ca 8.3-PRERELEASE FreeBSD 8.3-PR

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2012-01-10 Thread Guy Helmer
On Jan 10, 2012, at 4:04 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > cc -O2 -pipe -DLIBC_SCCS -DINET6 -I/src/lib/libutil > -I/src/lib/libutil/../libc/gen/ -std=gnu99 -fstack-protector -Wsystem-headers > -Werror -Wall -Wno-format-y2k -W -Wno-unused-parameter -Wstrict-prototypes > -Wmissing-prototypes -Wpoi

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On 25. Dec 2011, at 11:42 , Justin Hibbits wrote: >>> Sorry about this, bad patch when I tested the build. I'll fix it tomorrow >>> when I get time. >> >> >> Something like this? >> >> Andreas >> >> Index: hwpmc_powerpc.c >> === >

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Dec 25, 2011 5:27 AM, "Andreas Tobler" wrote: > > On 25.12.11 00:59, Justin Hibbits wrote: >> >> On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote: >>> >>> >>> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on >> >> freebsd-current.sentex.ca >>> >>> TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting H

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-25 Thread Andreas Tobler
On 25.12.11 00:59, Justin Hibbits wrote: On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote: TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - cleaning

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-24 Thread Dimitry Andric
On 2011-12-24 19:21, Marius Strobl wrote: On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:43:51PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: ... TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc ... stage 4.4: buildi

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-24 Thread Justin Hibbits
On Dec 24, 2011 6:46 PM, "FreeBSD Tinderbox" wrote: > > TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - tinderbox 2.8 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc > TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13:44 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2011-12-24 21:13

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-12-24 Thread Marius Strobl
On Sat, Dec 24, 2011 at 03:43:51PM +, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - tinderbox 2.8 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc > TB --- 2011-12-24 13:54:50 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-11-06 Thread Ed Schouten
* FreeBSD Tinderbox , 2006 20:28: > atrun.o:(.got+0x28): undefined reference to `effective_uid' > atrun.o:(.got+0x30): undefined reference to `effective_gid' > atrun.o:(.got+0x40): undefined reference to `real_gid' > atrun.o:(.got+0x48): undefined reference to `real_uid' Sorry about that. Shou

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2011-01-30 Thread Ulrich Spörlein
[Picking a random tinderbox mail] As I've broken the powerpc64 build a couple of days ago, I was amazed that none of these emails went to my Inbox. Whenever the ports' INDEX build is broken, there's a list of committers that are most likely to blame for it. I would welcome the same type of emails

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-12-22 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Wed, 22 Dec 2010, Robert Watson wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: I think Tinderbox has a bad source tree. Lines 557 and 569 make sense from the old version of kern_fail.c before either of my commits. So is Tinderbox somehow building with an old kern_fail.c but an updated

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-12-22 Thread Robert Watson
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: I think Tinderbox has a bad source tree. Lines 557 and 569 make sense from the old version of kern_fail.c before either of my commits. So is Tinderbox somehow building with an old kern_fail.c but an updated sys/fail.h? That would explain the build er

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-12-22 Thread Bjoern A. Zeeb
On Tue, 21 Dec 2010, Mike Tancsa wrote: On 12/21/2010 5:49 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote: /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete type /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-12-21 Thread Mike Tancsa
On 12/21/2010 5:49 PM, Matthew Fleming wrote: >> /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete >> type >> /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete >> type >> /src/sys/kern/kern_fail.c:557: error: dereferencing pointer to incomplete >>

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-12-21 Thread Matthew Fleming
On Tue, Dec 21, 2010 at 2:37 PM, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: > TB --- 2010-12-21 20:56:55 - tinderbox 2.6 running on > freebsd-current.sentex.ca > TB --- 2010-12-21 20:56:55 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc > TB --- 2010-12-21 20:56:55 - cleaning the object tree > TB --- 2010-12-2

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-29 Thread Mike Tancsa
At 07:29 PM 8/29/2010, Nathan Whitehorn wrote: Is something wrong with cvsup? This bug was fixed two days ago in SVN. Hi, There was a problem with the crontab entry on the local cvsup mirror that the tinder box syncs from for weekend runs / updates. I have fixed the ctab entry and kicked cvs

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-29 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/29/10 18:23, FreeBSD Tinderbox wrote: TB --- 2010-08-29 22:54:57 - tinderbox 2.6 running on freebsd-current.sentex.ca TB --- 2010-08-29 22:54:57 - starting HEAD tinderbox run for powerpc64/powerpc TB --- 2010-08-29 22:54:57 - cleaning the object tree TB --- 2010-08-29 22:55:09 - cvsupping t

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-22 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/22/10 07:10, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Nathan Whitehorn writes: Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: I'm not sure I understand what you mean (or rather, how it would help the tinderbox). What *would* help would be an easy way to determine, *before* trying to build it, whether a speci

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-22 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Nathan Whitehorn writes: > Dag-Erling Smørgrav writes: > > I'm not sure I understand what you mean (or rather, how it would > > help the tinderbox). What *would* help would be an easy way to > > determine, *before* trying to build it, whether a specific kernel > > config is appropriate for a spe

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-21 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/21/10 16:54, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Nathan Whitehorn writes: I'm the first to admit that many of the config tricks involved in this port, and GENERIC64, are ugly hacks, largely because config(8) was not designed with such things in mind. It's not just "config tricks and ugl

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-21 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Nathan Whitehorn writes: > I'm the first to admit that many of the config tricks involved in this > port, and GENERIC64, are ugly hacks, largely because config(8) was not > designed with such things in mind. It's not just "config tricks and ugly hacks", it also violates the assumption that target

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-20 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/20/10 14:20, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Nathan Whitehorn writes: Next up: tinderbox needs to build GENERIC64, not GENERIC, on powerpc64. make buildkernel is programmed to do the right thing is you don't pass a KERNCONF, but tinderbox apparently passes GENERIC explicitly. This one's in

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Nathan Whitehorn writes: > Next up: tinderbox needs to build GENERIC64, not GENERIC, on > powerpc64. make buildkernel is programmed to do the right thing is you > don't pass a KERNCONF, but tinderbox apparently passes GENERIC > explicitly. This one's in your court! There is no way to fix this wit

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-20 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/20/10 04:26, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: Nathan Whitehorn writes: The problem is that until yesterday, you could not build a powerpc64 LINT, and so it was trying to build a PPC32 kernel with a 64-bit toolchain. An actual powerpc64 kernel does not include ofw_standard.c. This should be

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-20 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
Nathan Whitehorn writes: > The problem is that until yesterday, you could not build a powerpc64 > LINT, and so it was trying to build a PPC32 kernel with a 64-bit > toolchain. An actual powerpc64 kernel does not include > ofw_standard.c. This should be fixed now with r211483, so long as the > LINT

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-19 Thread Nathan Whitehorn
On 08/19/10 01:40, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: Kernel build for LINT started on Thu Aug 19 02:51:08 UTC 2010 stage 1: configuring the kernel stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree stage 2.3: build tools stage 3.1: making depende

Re: [head tinderbox] failure on powerpc64/powerpc

2010-08-19 Thread Dag-Erling Smørgrav
FreeBSD Tinderbox writes: Kernel build for LINT started on Thu Aug 19 02:51:08 UTC 2010 stage 1: configuring the kernel stage 2.1: cleaning up the object tree stage 2.2: rebuilding the object tree stage 2.3: build tools stage 3.1: making dependencies stage 3.2: b