In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Patrick M. Hausen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yes, but now we have three different ways to update:
[...]
> 2. call cvsup from /usr/local/etc/periodic with supfiles for whatever you
>need ...
Not a good idea. Add a new crontab entry instead. If everybody u
Bill Fumerola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As the person who implemented PORTSSUPFILE, I'd object. Originally
> SUPFILE2 was set to the ports-supfile, so to preserve original
> behavior (that is, updating ports along with src/) that stayed in.
Very well.
> To some of us, updating both at the sa
Hi all!
Bill Fumerola wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
>
> > Why does "make update" in /usr/src also include a cvsup of /usr/ports?
> >
> > Since /usr/ports and /usr/docs have Makefiles and "update" targets
> > of their own, and the alternative upd
On Mon, Feb 07, 2000 at 10:31:17PM +0100, Christian Weisgerber wrote:
> Why does "make update" in /usr/src also include a cvsup of /usr/ports?
>
> Since /usr/ports and /usr/docs have Makefiles and "update" targets
> of their own, and the alternative update by cvs doesn't cover
> /usr/ports eithe
