Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad David writes: >On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> >> Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning "md10ec" which it shouldn't >> do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the >> minutes right now to hunt

Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Chad David
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 05:00:16PM +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > > Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning "md10ec" which it shouldn't > do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the > minutes right now to hunt it down. > > Should be quite simple to nail, it's just

Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Chad David
On Fri, Oct 19, 2001 at 08:24:57AM -0700, John Baldwin wrote: > > On 19-Oct-01 Chad David wrote: > > I posted a bug report and patch in kern/29104 and Dima Dorfman also mentioned > > this in July/August, but it still has not been resolved. The method of > > triggering it that I detailed in my bu

RE: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread John Baldwin
On 19-Oct-01 Chad David wrote: > I posted a bug report and patch in kern/29104 and Dima Dorfman also mentioned > this in July/August, but it still has not been resolved. The method of > triggering it that I detailed in my bug report no longer seems to work, > but I've managed to create another o

Re: disk_clone() bug

2001-10-19 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
Sounds like the bug is the md driver cloning "md10ec" which it shouldn't do. This bug must naturally be in md_clone(), but I don't have the minutes right now to hunt it down. Should be quite simple to nail, it's just some string handling code. Poul-Henning In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Chad