Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-09 Thread Jens Rehsack
John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: John Baldwin wrote: Thanks, IRQ 16 was programmed as level, activelo, so it wasn't an off by one error there. Grr. I've seen, but I didn't found a bios option to set it to edge. Is there anything I can do on my machine to fix the problem, or

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-09 Thread John Baldwin
On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: > >> Thanks, IRQ 16 was programmed as level, activelo, so it wasn't an >> off by one error there. Grr. > > I've seen, but I didn't found a bios option to set it to edge. > Is there anything I can do on my machine to fix the problem, or >

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Jens Rehsack
John Baldwin wrote: Thanks, IRQ 16 was programmed as level, activelo, so it wasn't an off by one error there. Grr. I've seen, but I didn't found a bios option to set it to edge. Is there anything I can do on my machine to fix the problem, or should Asus be notified for a bios update or ...? Jens

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: > John Baldwin wrote: >> On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: >> >>>Lars Eggert wrote: >>> John Baldwin wrote: >On 07-Nov-2003 Lars Eggert wrote: > >>This looks similar to what I described in the "fwohci0 running wild" >>thread. In both

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Jens Rehsack
John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: Lars Eggert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Nov-2003 Lars Eggert wrote: This looks similar to what I described in the "fwohci0 running wild" thread. In both cases, irq16 seems to cause the problem... Really. Does this only happen with

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: > Lars Eggert wrote: >> John Baldwin wrote: >> >>> On 07-Nov-2003 Lars Eggert wrote: >>> Jens Rehsack wrote: > interrupt total rate > irq1: atkbd0 512 2 > irq8: rtc

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Jens Rehsack
Lars Eggert wrote: John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Nov-2003 Lars Eggert wrote: Jens Rehsack wrote: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 512 2 irq8: rtc 23419127 irq13: npx01

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Lars Eggert
John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Nov-2003 Lars Eggert wrote: Jens Rehsack wrote: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 512 2 irq8: rtc 23419127 irq13: npx01 0 irq14: ata0

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 07-Nov-2003 Lars Eggert wrote: > Jens Rehsack wrote: >> interrupt total rate >> irq1: atkbd0 512 2 >> irq8: rtc 23419127 >> irq13: npx01 0 >> irq14: ata0

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Jens Rehsack
Lars Eggert wrote: Jens Rehsack wrote: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 512 2 irq8: rtc 23419127 irq13: npx01 0 irq14: ata0 4422 24

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Lars Eggert
Jens Rehsack wrote: interrupt total rate irq1: atkbd0 512 2 irq8: rtc 23419127 irq13: npx01 0 irq14: ata0 4422 24 irq15: ata1

Re: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread Jens Rehsack
John Baldwin wrote: On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: Hi, I recompiled my system today and when it came up again, it was terrible slow. Using top I've seen, that there're around 25% cpu-time is used to handle interrupts. The kernel was configured using SMP ('cause it's a HTT enabled CPU) and API

RE: New interrupt code slows hyperthreading down

2003-11-07 Thread John Baldwin
On 07-Nov-2003 Jens Rehsack wrote: > Hi, > > I recompiled my system today and when it came up again, > it was terrible slow. Using top I've seen, that there're > around 25% cpu-time is used to handle interrupts. > The kernel was configured using SMP ('cause it's a HTT > enabled CPU) and APIC. Set