"Scott M. Likens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, such a strong comment from such a strong member. I would have
> thought you were to high to stoop that low?
>
> But I guess it's good to be flamed for being honest? is it not?
Pot, kettle, black.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"Scott M. Likens" writes:
> Ah, such a strong comment from such a strong member. I would have thought
> you were to high to stoop that low?
>
> But I guess it's good to be flamed for being honest? is it not?
Please don't encourage flames and flamers by responding to them.
M
--
Mark Murray
iumo
Ah, such a strong comment from such a strong member. I would have thought
you were to high to stoop that low?
But I guess it's good to be flamed for being honest? is it not?
--On Sunday, October 19, 2003 8:45 PM +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
"Scott M. Likens" <[EMAIL
"Scott M. Likens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Comments anyone?
Yes: you're an idiot. Go play somewhere else.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
On 18 Oct 2003 at 16:24, Scott M. Likens wrote:
> --On Saturday, October 18, 2003 6:25 PM -0400 Dan Langille
> > Cherse
> Cheers? ^^
Yeah, that's what it should have been. I blame my anticipation of
the baseball game...
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Hi All,
Well its all back to normal! By mounting devfs to the new virtual
chroot area I was able to complete a buildworld/installworld of the current
branch, after a reboot the system came right back up with all my old
services started normally.
Thanks,
-Jason
-Original Message
--On Saturday, October 18, 2003 6:25 PM -0400 Dan Langille
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 18 Oct 2003 at 12:16, Scott M. Likens wrote:
[stuff deleted]
Comments anyone?
Yes. Next time, don't bother posting.
I apologise for my previous post. I should have added what I was
thinking. That follows
:
:
:On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jason Dictos wrote:
:
:> 1. Had FreeBSD 5.1 system running.
:> 2. Did a cvsup get of stable (that's right, stable, so 4.9)
:> 3. Compiled make buildworld, then did a make build world, and re-compiled
:> with generic kernel
:> 4. Booted into a system which could not mount
On 18 Oct 2003 at 12:16, Scott M. Likens wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> Comments anyone?
Yes. Next time, don't bother posting.
I apologise for my previous post. I should have added what I was
thinking. That follows.
There's little use or sense in reacting the way you did (not that my
original po
you can mount devfs as many times as your system can handle it all over
the place.
Jason Dictos wrote:
No, can you mout devfs in a virtual root created by chroot? I know the devfs
is mounted on the real root, but when i chroot to the /mnt of my old drive
the /dev directory is empty with null-can
Jason Dictos writes:
> From what I understand in the freebsd hand book, a cvsup get and a
> buildworld won't touch anything in /etc, so if I just re-do a build
> world of current I an *assuming* i'll be able to get back on track.
Sort of.
You've changed versions pretty seriously, so its very like
>From what I understand in the freebsd hand book, a cvsup get and a
buildworld won't touch anything in /etc, so if I just re-do a build world of
current I an *assuming* i'll be able to get back on track.
-Jaosn
-Original Message-
From: Scott M. Likens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sa
Actually, I think I did... mergemaster?
Maybe no one caught it and assumed it was just a ranting flame, But I
imagine running mergemaster and making sure the system is synch'd would
make a world of difference.
Just a token thought.
--On Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:52 PM -0700 Jason Dictos
<
No, can you mout devfs in a virtual root created by chroot? I know the devfs
is mounted on the real root, but when i chroot to the /mnt of my old drive
the /dev directory is empty with null-can I re-mount in there?
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: slave-mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
On 18 Oct 2003 at 12:16, Scott M. Likens wrote:
[stuff deleted]
> Comments anyone?
Yes. Next time, don't bother posting.
--
Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-
On Fri, 17 Oct 2003, Jason Dictos wrote:
> 1. Had FreeBSD 5.1 system running.
> 2. Did a cvsup get of stable (that's right, stable, so 4.9)
> 3. Compiled make buildworld, then did a make build world, and re-compiled
> with generic kernel
> 4. Booted into a system which could not mount the file sy
Thanks scott, I'll try that out and let you know how it worked..
Oh wait.. You didn't say anything helpful n/m
-Jason
-Original Message-
From: Scott M. Likens [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, October 18, 2003 12:16 PM
To: Jason Dictos; '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Okay, let's see he
Okay, let's see here.
First off you install FreeBSD 5.1, UFS2 possibly but I guess UFS1 since it
booted 4.9
Some stupid reason you downgraded to 4.9, didn't run mergemaster, so all
your /etc files are out of whack, and now you're bitching that you're
trying to do buildworld again, and getting
did you mount the devfs?
Jason Dictos wrote:
Hi Guys, here's the scenario:
1. Had FreeBSD 5.1 system running.
2. Did a cvsup get of stable (that's right, stable, so 4.9)
3. Compiled make buildworld, then did a make build world, and re-compiled
with generic kernel
4. Booted into a system which co
19 matches
Mail list logo
