Have you checked for BIOS updates? The BIOS on recent Skylake laptops
have been a running disaster. At least the Dell XPS laptops had ACPI
errors be fixed by an update.
-M
On Sat, Jul 30, 2016 at 10:43 PM, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I get the following ACPI errors in my dmesg when booti
It would help if you would tell me when you last had a working kernel.
The output of acpidump -t -d -o martin.dsdt > martin.asl would also help.
-Nate
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsubsc
Martin wrote:
Hi,
I have more problems to report with the ACPI support and will submit a
PR, if you want. I don't know when this got broken.
Here some pieces of my dmesg:
---
FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT #0: Thu Sep 4 22:38:56 CEST 2003
[...]
acpi0: on motherboard
Take a look at PR kern/48494, ther
Am Do, 2003-09-04 um 23.56 schrieb David O'Brien:
> Athlon-based?
No.
CPU: Pentium III/Pentium III Xeon/Celeron (501.14-MHz 686-class CPU)
Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x673 Stepping = 3
Features=0x383f9ff
It's an old Abit mainboard, but everything always worked here.
Martin
_
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:30:49PM +0200, Martin wrote:
> I have more problems to report with the ACPI support and will submit a
> PR, if you want. I don't know when this got broken.
...
> As you can see I recompiled today to confirm that the problem
> still exists. This is only about floppy. Every
On Wed, Jun 18, 2003 at 09:11:23AM +0200, Maikel Verheijen wrote:
> I have recently installed FreeBSD 5.1 on my Dell C800 laptop, and I get
> quite a lot (well: 48 :) of these errors on boot:
>
> ACPI-0293: *** Warning: Buffer created with zero length in AML
> -0166: *** Error: UtAlloc
>It seems like the fix right now is to disable it.
>Put this line:
>hint.acpi.0.disabled="1"
>in /boot/device.hints
Thankyou, this has given me a nice clean bootup now and I can reboot without
it panicing.
I'm still curious to learn what all that stuff ment though!
---
Matt ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
h
At 06:04 PM 3/16/2003, Matt wrote:
Hi,
I have just recently installed -CURRENT on my desktop as I've been using it
succesfully on a server for months now. However this desktop has much more
advanced hardware. Whilst it does work perfectly and I have device support for
everything I get a lot of ACP
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Adrian Neumaier wrote:
> on of the problems this here:
>
> ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
> ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method execution failed, AE_ERROR
> ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for [EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
> ACPI-1287: *** Er
> On Thu, 28 Nov 2002 13:38:13 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mitsuru> The patches against today's CURRENT at:
Mitsuru>
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021118-20021122-test20021128.diff
Mitsuru> Please try this if you have problems about
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hongbo Li wrot
e:
>I installed FBSD-current on my laptop(IBM Thinkpad
>A21m). These were some error messages about ACPI in
>dmesg:
>
>system power profile changed to 'economy'
>ACPI-0432: *** Error: Handler for
>[EmbeddedControl] returned AE_ERROR
>ACPI-1287:
Saturday, November 30, 2002 4:34 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [acpi-jp 2009] Re: ACPI errors w/ latest ACPI code on GA BX2000
> based system
>
> * Mitsuru IWASAKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
>
> Iwasaki-san,
> list members,
>
>
: Saturday, November 30, 2002 4:34 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [acpi-jp 2009] Re: ACPI errors w/ latest ACPI code on GA BX2000
based system
* Mitsuru IWASAKI ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Iwasaki-san,
list members,
> > > ACPI-0438: *** Error: L
* De: Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [ Data: 2002-11-27 ]
[ Subjecte: Call for testers: acpica-unix-20021122 (was Re: ACPI errors and
then panic - fixed!) ]
> The patches against today's CURRENT at:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021118-20021122-
Hi all,
> > Our web person is out today, so things will be posted Monday at the
> > earliest.
> >
> > I'll email Iwasaki-san the latest release, so y'all can get going if you
> > want.
>
> Thank you!
> I've just confirmed that the deleted object problem had been solved in
> the latest release (A
Hi,
> Our web person is out today, so things will be posted Monday at the
> earliest.
>
> I'll email Iwasaki-san the latest release, so y'all can get going if you
> want.
Thank you!
I've just confirmed that the deleted object problem had been solved in
the latest release (Andy sent it to me).
I'
; To: 'Mitsuru IWASAKI'; Grover, Andrew; Moore, Robert
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!
>
>
>
> The deleted object problem has been fixed in the 20021122
> release which
]
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 1988] Re: ACPI errors and then panic - fixed!
Hi, Intel folks.
It seems that there is a bug in cached object utilization.
This causes strange behavior;
first evaluation of \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST is OK, but
second (or later) evaluation returns AE_TYPE.
> acpi_cmbat0: er
> On Tue, 26 Nov 2002 14:33:09 +0900 (JST), Mitsuru IWASAKI
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
Mitsuru> Hi,
Mitsuru> Are you trying this with acpica-unix-20021118 patch which was
Mitsuru> announced recently?
Mitsuru>
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021002-20021118-te
Hi, Intel folks.
It seems that there is a bug in cached object utilization.
This causes strange behavior;
first evaluation of \_SB_.PCI0.LPC_.EC__.BAT0._BST is OK, but
second (or later) evaluation returns AE_TYPE.
> acpi_cmbat0: error fetching current battery status -- AE_TYPE
The raw DSDT is at:
On Thu, 21 Nov 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> > > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
> > > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
> > > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > > > My laptop appears to
Hi,
Are you trying this with acpica-unix-20021118 patch which was
announced recently?
http://people.freebsd.org/~iwasaki/acpi/acpica-20021002-20021118-test20021121.diff
Also [EMAIL PROTECTED] is better place for ACPI CA related
problem reports.
Thanks
From: Sid Carter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
Hi,
> On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> > From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
> > Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > > My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get
> > >
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
> Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > My laptop appears to work ok without ACPI but of course I don't get
> > suspend, resume, etc
Thank you for the reply.
On Sat, 5 Oct 2002, Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> Hi,
> # ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> # so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem.
Ok, I didn't know that.
> From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
>
Hi,
# ACPI CA related problem should be sent to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# so that Intel folks can be aware of the problem.
From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ACPI errors and then panic
Date: Fri, 4 Oct 2002 17:14:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> My laptop appears to work ok
Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> [move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
>
> Hi,
>
> > System: TOS 5005-S504
> > Error with any kernel build:
> > Using $PIR table, 0 entries at 0xc00f0190
> > ACPI-0171: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: RSDP Failed validation: AE_BAD_SIGNAT
URE
> >
-Original Message-
From: Mitsuru IWASAKI [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sun 8/4/2002 8:59 AM
To: Robert D Hughes
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ACPI errors
[move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
It seems Mitsuru IWASAKI wrote:
> [move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
>
> Hi,
>
> > System: TOS 5005-S504
> > Error with any kernel build:
> > Using $PIR table, 0 entries at 0xc00f0190
> > ACPI-0171: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: RSDP Failed validation: AE_BAD_SIGNATURE
[move to -current because STABLE don't have acpica support yet]
Hi,
> System: TOS 5005-S504
> Error with any kernel build:
> Using $PIR table, 0 entries at 0xc00f0190
> ACPI-0171: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: RSDP Failed validation: AE_BAD_SIGNATURE
> ACPI-0213: *** Error: AcpiLoadTables: Could no
On 03-Sep-01 Mike Smith wrote:
>> I'm getting this with the recent ACPI code, should I worry about it?
>>
>> acpi_cpu0: on acpi0
>> acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overflows P_CNT register
>> acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit
>
> You shouldn't worry about it, no. I need to get my hands on s
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 04:20:57PM -0700, Mike Smith wrote:
> > I'm getting this with the recent ACPI code, should I worry about it?
> >
> > acpi_cpu0: on acpi0
> > acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overflows P_CNT register
> > acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit
>
> You shouldn't worry about it,
> I'm getting this with the recent ACPI code, should I worry about it?
>
> acpi_cpu0: on acpi0
> acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overflows P_CNT register
> acpi_cpu: CLK_VAL field overlaps THT_EN bit
You shouldn't worry about it, no. I need to get my hands on some more
details so that I can understand
33 matches
Mail list logo
