> On 23 Jan 2016, at 06:41 , Ernie Luzar wrote:
>
> Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
>>> On 24 Aug 2015, at 19:08 , Mark Felder wrote:
>>>
>>> What is preventing RCTL from being enabled right now? Any known/serious
>>> blockers?
>> It’s enabled in GENERIC.
>>> And the same for VIMAGE? I know there were i
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 24 Aug 2015, at 19:08 , Mark Felder wrote:
What is preventing RCTL from being enabled right now? Any known/serious
blockers?
It’s enabled in GENERIC.
And the same for VIMAGE? I know there were issues with some firewalls,
but I'm not sure where that stands today. Do
Mark Felder wrote on 08/24/2015 21:29:
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, at 14:18, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
On 24 Aug 2015, at 19:08 , Mark Felder wrote:
What is preventing RCTL from being enabled right now? Any known/serious
blockers?
Its enabled in GENERIC.
If RCTL is in GENERIC, can somebody look o
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015, at 14:18, Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> > On 24 Aug 2015, at 19:08 , Mark Felder wrote:
> >
> > What is preventing RCTL from being enabled right now? Any known/serious
> > blockers?
>
> It’s enabled in GENERIC.
>
>
This is great news!
https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base/head/sy
> On 24 Aug 2015, at 19:08 , Mark Felder wrote:
>
> What is preventing RCTL from being enabled right now? Any known/serious
> blockers?
It’s enabled in GENERIC.
> And the same for VIMAGE? I know there were issues with some firewalls,
> but I'm not sure where that stands today. Does it degrade
Hi all,
Now that the internet has reached "peak container", I would like to see
less barriers of entry for deploying such environments on FreeBSD. This
includes enabling RCTL and VIMAGE in CURRENT so we can hopefully ship
them with 11.0-RELEASE.
I know of a moderately sized deployment of jails+RC
