Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-04-01 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Joe Marcus Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I think I found why pam_ldap wouldn't work with OpenPAM on -CURRENT. > Attached is my proposed patch to OpenPAM. With this applied, pam_ldap > works like a champ. But of course! Thank you very much, that was a stupid braino. DES -- Dag-Erling S

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-31 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 10:00, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. > > Here's an updated (but untested) version. > I think I found why pam_ldap wouldn't work with OpenPAM on -CURRENT. Attached is my

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-26 Thread Joe Clarke
On 25 Mar 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. > > Here's an updated (but untested) version. The patch applies cleanly, and pam_ldap builds. Howvever, every service I try to authenticate wit

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-25 Thread Joe Marcus Clarke
On Mon, 2002-03-25 at 10:00, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. > > Here's an updated (but untested) version. Thanks. As soon as I finish get my -current machine built, I'll test these out. Joe

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Joe Clarke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thanks. Here's an updated (but untested) version. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- pam_ldap.c.orig Mon Mar 25 15:54:28 2002 +++ pam_ldap.c Mon Mar 25 15:54:29 2002 @@ -126,12 +126

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-25 Thread Joe Clarke
On 25 Mar 2002, Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > bftpd-1.0.22.log > > pam-pgsql-0.5.2_2.log > > Not tested. > > > pam_ldap-1.4.0.log > > Not my problem; I sent the maintainer a patch ages ago. Really? I never received it. Please send it again. Thank

Re: Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-25 Thread Dag-Erling Smorgrav
Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > bftpd-1.0.22.log > pam-pgsql-0.5.2_2.log Not tested. > pam_ldap-1.4.0.log Not my problem; I sent the maintainer a patch ages ago. > pam_mysql-0.4.7.log Not tested. > pam_ssh-1.5.log This port should die, pam_ssh(8) is in the base system and the po

Ports broken by OpenPAM

2002-03-24 Thread Kris Kennaway
..include the following: bftpd-1.0.22.log pam-pgsql-0.5.2_2.log pam_ldap-1.4.0.log pam_mysql-0.4.7.log pam_ssh-1.5.log samba-3.0a15.log vlock-1.3.log Logs available on bento: http://bento.freebsd.org/errorlogs/5-latest/ Kris msg36531/pgp0.pgp Description: PGP signature