On Tue, Sep 12, 2000 at 06:28:05PM -0700, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > I'm also not sure where the rumors about a FreeBSD 4.1.5 got started
> > since I'd certainly never planned on such a thing, that, I think,
4.1.1 rather than 4.1.5 please.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "un
> A certain user called jkh on IRC :-). I asked you and you agreed to it as
> a net-only release.
Hmmm. I must have been on drugs. :) Very well, I'll see what can be
done. A test release is actually building right now.
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe
On Tue, 12 Sep 2000, Jordan Hubbard wrote:
> I'm also not sure where the rumors about a FreeBSD 4.1.5 got started
> since I'd certainly never planned on such a thing, that, I think,
A certain user called jkh on IRC :-). I asked you and you agreed to it as
a net-only release.
Kris
--
In God we
> > On that subject, can you give me a rough projection as to when
> > 5.0-RELEASE is likely to arrive?
>
> FreeBSD 2.2.1 1997-04-xx [FBD]
> FreeBSD 3.0 1998-10-16 [FBD]
> FreeBSD 4.0 2000-03-13 [FBD]
You forgot FreeBSD 4.1, 2000-07-27 (www.freebsd.org/releases)
On Fri 2000-09-08 (15:19), John Toon wrote:
> > I have a plan to revamp the way that the startup process's output is
> > presented and stored for later viewing. I need to chat to some folks
> > first about the best way to do this, first. Be patient, and look
> > forward to something interesting
Sheldon Hearn wrote:
> I have a plan to revamp the way that the startup process's output is
> presented and stored for later viewing. I need to chat to some folks
> first about the best way to do this, first. Be patient, and look
> forward to something interesting in 5.0-RELEASE. :-)
>
> Ciao,
On Fri, 08 Sep 2000 23:07:22 +0930, Matthew Thyer wrote:
> Anyone else noticed how FreeBSD is inconsistent with the use of words
> like "Doing", "setting" and "starting" in the boot messages ?
Yes, but I wouldn't worry about it at this stage.
I have a plan to revamp the way that the startup p
Anyone else noticed how FreeBSD is inconsistent with the use of words
like "Doing", "setting" and "starting" in the boot messages ?
For instance, I think the following fragment of my boot should change
from:
Additional routing options: tcp extensions=NO TCP keepalive=YES.
routing daemons:.
Mount
