Re: Perl wrapper bad

2002-06-08 Thread J. Mallett
* From Joshua Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > ... when I say "bad" I don't mean in execution. I mean that > the idea of a redirecting wrapper for one special program seems to > me an architectural wart that shouldn't be pushed on the userbase. With no gain except supporting improperly-shebanged scr

Perl wrapper bad

2002-06-08 Thread Joshua Goodall
... when I say "bad" I don't mean in execution. I mean that the idea of a redirecting wrapper for one special program seems to me an architectural wart that shouldn't be pushed on the userbase. Not only does it conflict in style with the existing mailwrapper, but it introduces a DWIM feature with