Re: PPP over ATM

2000-11-06 Thread Brian Somers
> > >>>>Who knows about the ATM stuff in the kernel? > >>> > >>>We have two ATM stacks: > >>> * The minimalist "chuck" stack. > >>> * The full-blown HARP stack. > >>> > >>>Neither support net

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-23 Thread Archie Cobbs
Brian Smith writes: > >> Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient > >> to get PPP over ATM working? (I have a lot of reading up to do, but > > > >Mpd can do PPP over any netgraph hook, so unless there's some particular > >we

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-23 Thread Brian Smith
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 20:36:52 -0700 (PDT), Archie Cobbs wrote: >> Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient >> to get PPP over ATM working? (I have a lot of reading up to do, but > >Mpd can do PPP over any netgraph hook, so unless there's som

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Archie Cobbs
Brian Smith writes: > >>Are you aware of any efforts to add PPP over ATM or Netgraph > >>support to the current ATM code? > > > >I'm not aware of any activity in the ATM code at all... > > Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be suff

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Brian Smith
t;>Neither support netgraph. >> >>Are you aware of any efforts to add PPP over ATM or Netgraph >>support to the current ATM code? > >I'm not aware of any activity in the ATM code at all... Ok, well if I were to netgraphify the ATM code, would mpd be sufficient to g

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
ck" stack. >> * The full-blown HARP stack. >> >>Neither support netgraph. > >Are you aware of any efforts to add PPP over ATM or Netgraph >support to the current ATM code? I'm not aware of any activity in the ATM code at all... -- Poul-Henning Kamp

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Brian Smith
On Sun, 22 Oct 2000 03:16:38 +0200, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: > >>Who knows about the ATM stuff in the kernel? > >We have two ATM stacks: > * The minimalist "chuck" stack. > * The full-blown HARP stack. > >Neither support netgraph. Are you aware

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Poul-Henning Kamp
>Who knows about the ATM stuff in the kernel? We have two ATM stacks: * The minimalist "chuck" stack. * The full-blown HARP stack. Neither support netgraph. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committe

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Brian Smith
all together, preferably with netgraph >as the framework >to do so. Well it is for DSL but, the adapter he has is already supported by FreeBSD. Just the PPP over ATM is an issue. Brian Smith To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message

Re: PPP over ATM

2000-10-22 Thread Julian Elischer
Brian Smith wrote: > > I was wondering what the state of PPP over ATM is, if there is at all. And would >like to offer my services in it's > development if it isn't finished (or started) yet. I inquired on #FreeBSDHelp on >EFNet but I didn't get any > usefu

PPP over ATM

2000-10-21 Thread Brian Smith
I was wondering what the state of PPP over ATM is, if there is at all. And would like to offer my services in it's development if it isn't finished (or started) yet. I inquired on #FreeBSDHelp on EFNet but I didn't get any useful results. I am not sure if this is the corr