Guys (; Girls; small fuzzy creatures);
We can talk about this forever, or someone can go over the existing 32
bit CUDA stuff in a 32 bit Linuxolator, get it all going, document it,
and post it or all to use.
Which do you think is going to be more productive?
Adrian
_
On 08/30/11 23:26, K. Macy wrote:
But the lack of response and non-shown interests shows a undeobtly signal
that freeBSD seems to be
dead for the HPC community and this could be also an indication for the lack
of CUDA support
by nVidia, Why performing efforts if no one cares? A great chance seems
On 8/30/11, K. Macy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni
> wrote:
>> FWIW;
>>
>> Christopher Bergström and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath
>> Compiler Suite, but no one followed up:
>>
>> (From the WantedPorts Wiki)
>> https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite
>>
No one has
On 08/30/11 22:14, K. Macy wrote:
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
FWIW;
Christopher Bergström and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath
Compiler Suite, but no one followed up:
(From the WantedPorts Wiki)
https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite
There has been very low int
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:22 PM, Hartmann, O.
wrote:
> But the lack of response and non-shown interests shows a undeobtly signal
> that freeBSD seems to be
> dead for the HPC community and this could be also an indication for the lack
> of CUDA support
> by nVidia, Why performing efforts if no on
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 11:22:17PM +0200, Hartmann, O. wrote:
> On 08/30/11 21:47, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> >
> >Christopher Bergstr?m and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath
> >Compiler Suite, but no one followed up:
> >
> >(From the WantedPorts Wiki)
> >https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite
> >
> But the lack of response and non-shown interests shows a undeobtly signal
> that freeBSD seems to be
> dead for the HPC community and this could be also an indication for the lack
> of CUDA support
> by nVidia, Why performing efforts if no one cares? A great chance seems to
> have passed by ...
On 08/30/11 21:47, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
FWIW;
Christopher Bergström and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath
Compiler Suite, but no one followed up:
(From the WantedPorts Wiki)
https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite
There has been very low interest in the FreeBSD port,
and unfortunately this
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 9:47 PM, Pedro F. Giffuni wrote:
> FWIW;
>
> Christopher Bergström and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath
> Compiler Suite, but no one followed up:
>
> (From the WantedPorts Wiki)
> https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite
>
> There has been very low interest in the FreeBSD p
FWIW;
Christopher Bergström and Pathscale delivered the EKOPath
Compiler Suite, but no one followed up:
(From the WantedPorts Wiki)
https://github.com/pathscale/path64-suite
There has been very low interest in the FreeBSD port,
and unfortunately this is a bad signal that we give to
companies tha
> By the beginning of this year Pathscale introduced a kind of compiler
> capable of HMPP, a very smart model
> like OpenMP. This compiler seems not to be ready by now and I never got
> access to a beta version to test
> whether it was capable of compiling CUDA ready code. As far as I know,
> HMPP
On 30 August 2011 01:52, Jacob Frelinger wrote:
> cuda device support is there, what I believe is missing is the compiler,
> libraries and assorted tools. I currently use cuda on my FreeBSD laptop via
> the linuxlator (using the gentoo_stage_3 port and chrooting into it). The
> cuda run time wo
On 08/29/11 08:12, Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
FreeBSD runtime.
Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
to bring the Linux CUDA SDK up in th
[snip]
32 bit CUDA support may be limiting to you, but it's:
* not necessarily limiting to others;
* a good starting point to demonstrate it's actually feasible;
* a potential stepping stone to getting 64 bit support of some sort in
place (whether it's the push for 64 bit linux support; or to get
Hi all,
I'm involved in the Phoronix test suite. I'm on freebs d-performance, so
if you have any questions - CC me or
freebsd-performance. Regards,
Matthee
_
On Aug= 29, 2011 5:38 AM, Yamagi Burmeister wrot
On 08/29/11 14:31, Yamagi Burmeister wrote:
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:12:54 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
Hi,
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
FreeBSD runtime.
Can someone please do some legwork with thi
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 2:12 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
>
> This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
> FreeBSD runtime.
>
> Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
> to bring
On Mon, 29 Aug 2011 20:12:54 +0800
Adrian Chadd wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
>
> This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
> FreeBSD runtime.
>
> Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
> to
Hi,
http://forums.nvidia.com/index.php?showtopic=38242 Post 18
This indicates the driver supports CUDA somehow. What's missing is a
FreeBSD runtime.
Can someone please do some legwork with this and see if it's possible
to bring the Linux CUDA SDK up in the linuxulator?
Adrian
On 29 August 201
Hello out there.
Just read this a day ago at Phoronix:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=OTg0MQ
I've also read that there is work done on the PTX assembly backend in
LLVM for generation code for nVidia GPUs.
I'm still grasping for the silky fathem having GPGPU on FreeBSD anyway
20 matches
Mail list logo
