* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
The patch is complete, see https://reviews.freebsd.org/D1600.
- With it, for all knobs from src.conf(5) there are no difference in
file tree contents between `KNOB make installworld` and `make
installworld && KNOB make delete-old delete-old-libs`
-
> In other words, if a user has some WITHOUT_* set in src.conf,
> specific files are not installed by installworld, but not removed
> by remove-old, which I try to fix.
Please carry on, I saw quite a few times that this behaviour was
assumed by new users, only it is not (yet), to their surprise :
* Dmitry Marakasov (amdmi3@hades.panopticon) wrote:
> Also there is a question of delete-old-dirs removing directories
> which are created by mtree run by installworld unconditionally.
> This seems to be incorrect - either directories should be installed
> conditionally or not removed by delete-ol
* Garrett Cooper (yaneurab...@gmail.com) wrote:
> >>> Hi Dmitry,
> >>> Seems like we’ve duplicated work a bit. Have you looked at
> >>> ^/projects/building-blocks yet ?
> >>
> >> Hm, seems so, partly. How do you gather missing entries? My way is
> >> pretty dumb, I just do bunch of installworl
On Jan 23, 2015, at 17:20, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Jan 23, 2015, at 17:16, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>
>> * Garrett Cooper (yaneurab...@gmail.com) wrote:
>>
>>>> Some years ago I've started a project of improving
>>>> OptionalObsoleteFiles
On Jan 23, 2015, at 17:16, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Garrett Cooper (yaneurab...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>> Some years ago I've started a project of improving
>>> OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness, which allows make delete-old
>>> / delete-old-libs
* Garrett Cooper (yaneurab...@gmail.com) wrote:
> > Some years ago I've started a project of improving
> > OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness, which allows make delete-old
> > / delete-old-libs / delete-old-dirs targets completelty remove files
> > which are nor
On Jan 23, 2015, at 16:29, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> Some years ago I've started a project of improving
> OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness, which allows make delete-old
> / delete-old-libs / delete-old-dirs targets completelty remove files
> which are
Hi!
Some years ago I've started a project of improving
OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc completeness, which allows make delete-old
/ delete-old-libs / delete-old-dirs targets completelty remove files
which are normally installed when specific src.conf WITHOUT_* knobs
are set.
In other words, if a
* Dmitry Marakasov (amd...@amdmi3.ru) wrote:
So would someone please commit it?
--
Dmitry Marakasov . 55B5 0596 FF1E 8D84 5F56 9510 D35A 80DD F9D2 F77D
amd...@amdmi3.ru ..: jabber: amd...@jabber.ruhttp://www.amdmi3.ru
___
freebsd-current@fre
On 2012-Jun-01 20:50:24 +0200, Ulrich Spörlein wrote:
>Why is xargs even calling /bin/echo when "utility" is not specified.
Because that's what it's documented as doing.
>Shouldn't it just print a certain number of arguments (one in this
>case)?
The current approach is simpler - there's always
On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 07:20:42 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> On 2012-May-30 13:27:03 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> >On 2012-May-29 02:18:25 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> >>Then you should try to profile it - my script basically runs
> >>delete-old delete-old-libs for every knob (131 of them), an
On 2012-May-30 13:27:03 +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
>On 2012-May-29 02:18:25 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>>Then you should try to profile it - my script basically runs
>>delete-old delete-old-libs for every knob (131 of them), and it
>>hadn't taken more than 4 seconds even once.
>
>I've done so
On 2012-May-29 02:18:25 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
>> My experience is that it now takes about 2½ minutes on 10.x with warm
>> caches, compared to less than 1 second on 8.x.
>
>Now = after applying my patch or after changing system? Which knobs
>were
On 5/28/2012 3:05 PM, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
introduced seem to bear me out. :)
>>>
>>> Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
>>
>> It doesn't catch thi
* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
> >> >2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
> >> >- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
> >> >this (old) branch.
> >>
> >> Another con: "make delete-old" on -current takes about 2 orders
* Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> >> this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
> >> introduced seem to bear me out. :)
> >
> > Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
>
> It doesn't catch things it needs to
> It catches things it shouldn't
>
On 05/28/2012 13:23, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:59:17 -0700 Doug Barton
> wrote:
>
>> this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
>> introduced seem to bear me out. :)
>
> Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
It doesn't cat
On Tue, 29 May 2012 06:04:03 +1000 Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> My experience is that it now takes about 2½ minutes on 10.x with warm
> caches, compared to less than 1 second on 8.x. For most of that time,
> there's no output and there's no warning of the increased time. I
> actually wrote about the p
On Mon, 28 May 2012 12:59:17 -0700 Doug Barton
wrote:
> this issue. The numerous problems we've had with it ever since it was
> introduced seem to bear me out. :)
Can you list them? A missing obsolete file doesn't count.
Bye,
Alexander.
--
http://www.Leidinger.netAlexander @ Leidinger.net
On 2012-May-28 23:55:42 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
>
>> >2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
>> >- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
>> >this (old) branch.
>>
>> Another con: "m
On 05/28/2012 12:52, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> * Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
>
>>> I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
>>> tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
>>> targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
>>>
>>> E.g. w
* Peter Jeremy (pe...@rulingia.com) wrote:
> >2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
> >- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
> >this (old) branch.
>
> Another con: "make delete-old" on -current takes about 2 orders of
> magnitude
* Doug Barton (do...@freebsd.org) wrote:
> > I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
> > tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
> > targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
> >
> > E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make del
I'm pro improving completeness, as most people are
really surprised when after setting WITHOUT* they
are left with old cruft from first install, what's more
important- it's getting left "as is" with all possible
(security) bugs.
Just be careful, as after recent expansion it looked
here like setti
On 2012-May-27 18:05:41 +0400, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
>2) Is this ok to backport the list from current to stable branches? Pro
>- it's really simple, con - it will contain files never installed with
>this (old) branch.
Another con: "make delete-old" on -current takes about 2 orders of
magnitude
On 05/27/2012 07:05, Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
> tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
> targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
>
> E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make d
Hi!
I'm running a little pet project of improving completeness of
tools/build/mk/OptionalObsoleteFiles.inc file and thus delete-old*
targets with regard to all possible WITHOUT_* knobs.
E.g. when WITHOUT_foo is defined in src.conf, make delete-old should
remove related files completely, to make a
28 matches
Mail list logo
