2012/3/1 Eygene Ryabinkin
> Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> > I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with
> > something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling
> request
> > for open source license.
>
> Are you request
Thu, Mar 01, 2012 at 02:31:06PM +0200, Alexander Yerenkow wrote:
> I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but he is always busy with
> something. Maybe someone of you guys could be interested in filling request
> for open source license.
Are you requesting someone to create FreeBSD port for th
I think this is just right post to intrude :)
I'm developing software, and making it in pretty good IDE - Intellij Idea.
There's community and pro version.
What good in this company - it gives access to Pro version for not-small
open source projects.
I tried to take some time of Philip Paeps, but
On 03/01/12 09:49, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
>> On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on
On 2012-Feb-28, 15:44, Pietro Cerutti wrote:
> On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> > > At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > > Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on
> > > ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage
On 2012-Feb-26, 11:48, O. Hartmann wrote:
> On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> > At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
> > Codelite, i use it and works fine (Freebsd 8.2) with Clang. Version on
> > ports is 3.0 not 3.5. On the webpage you have information about how to
> > configure for us
: Eduardo Morras
Cc: Current FreeBSD ; Ports FreeBSD
Sent: Sun, February 26, 2012 4:48:36 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE,
Am 23.02.2012 12:22, schrieb O. Hartmann:
> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
> was highly customizable, flexible and
On 02/23/12 14:38, Eduardo Morras wrote:
> At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
>> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
>> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this
I don't disagree. I was disagreeing with the notion that Unix is an IDE.
From: Quentin Schwerkolt
To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 9:44:50 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Ok, but I think an IDE that can easily co
IDE.
Dan.
From: Jan Mikkelsen
To: O. Hartmann
Cc: Current FreeBSD
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:47:37 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation.
If you don't think that's enough, you nee
23, 2012 7:47:37 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation.
If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking
for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with m
Unix is the original IDE. FreeBSD is a good modern implementation.
If you don't think that's enough, you need to say what you're really looking
for, rather than just an IDE. It sounds like you're after an editor with more
general niftiness. Visual Slickedit?
On 23/02/2012, at 10:22 PM, O. Hartm
JDK 7... though I wouldn't necessarily recommend it.
Dan.
From: Martin Schütte
Cc: Current FreeBSD
Sent: Thu, February 23, 2012 7:45:42 AM
Subject: Re: No working IDE in FreeBSD!
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hart
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/23/12 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote:
> CLANG. ECLIPSE is to large and it does not fit my purpose. I tried
You could try NetBeans, but its size is comparable to Eclipse.
- --
Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (FreeBSD)
Comm
At 12:22 23/02/2012, O. Hartmann wrote:
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and even Fre
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 3:22 PM, O. Hartmann <
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> devel/anjuta is broken, so no chance. I also tried KDevelop, since many
> of our Linux based scientists feel good having this very popular IDE,
> but it is marked "broken" on FreeBSD.
>
I'm using kdevelop-kd
I don't know how well it would suit your purpose, but you could always
try emacs-ide (at http://gna.org/projects/emacs-ide/ )
--
Igor M. :-)
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current
To unsu
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 6:22 AM, O. Hartmann <
ohart...@mail.zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
> for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
> written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since th
On 23-02-2012 12:22, O. Hartmann wrote:
> Before I waste more time on searching for a suitable IDE apart ANJUTA,
> I'd like to ask people here what alternative they would suggest if the
> focus is devel/anjuta. Eclipse is no way, KDevelop is broken, CodeBlocks
> is incapable of being easily adapted
Several time ago I tried to do some development within an IDE, not even
for lectural and educational purposes. Since most of our software is
written in C/C++ and OpenCL, I highly prefered ANJUTA, since this IDE
was highly customizable, flexible and even FreeBSD's ancient outdated
version in the por
21 matches
Mail list logo
