On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 04:41:35PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:24:13 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 a
On Wednesday, March 28, 2012 3:24:13 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > > [...]
> > > > and
> > >
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 02:38:42PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > [...]
> > > and
> > > > 10 remove that block :
> > > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/workaround-
On Tuesday, November 15, 2011 6:12:53 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> [...]
> > and
> > > 10 remove that block :
> > > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/workaround-to-boot-p5ne.diff
> >
> > Yeah, the problem is that NVIDIA chipsets seem
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 12:46:41PM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
[...]
> and
> > 10 remove that block :
> > http://people.freebsd.org/~bapt/workaround-to-boot-p5ne.diff
>
> Yeah, the problem is that NVIDIA chipsets seem to have really odd behavior in
> that once you turn MSI mapping on for a given n
On Friday, November 11, 2011 5:59:07 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > > > the r
On Fri, Nov 11, 2011 at 11:10:58PM +0100, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > > the result is:
> > > > > db> show intrcnt
> > > > > cpu0: timer4510
> > > >
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:22:54AM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > > the result is:
> > > > db> show intrcnt
> > > > cpu0: timer4510
> > > > irq256: hdac0 1
> > > > cpu3: timer 29
> > > > cpu1: timer 3036
> >
On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 10:39:38PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > > the result is:
> > > db> show intrcnt
> > > cpu0: timer4510
> > > irq256: hdac0 1
> > > cpu3: timer 29
> > > cpu1: timer 3036
> > > cpu2: timer 31
> > > db>
> > >
> > > I did break at the mountfrom> prompt
oblem.
Chers,
Uwe
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: owner-freebsd-curr...@freebsd.org [mailto:owner-freebsd-
> curr...@freebsd.org] Im Auftrag von Baptiste Daroussin
> Gesendet: Sonntag, 11. September 2011 22:40
> An: John Baldwin
> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
> Betre
> > the result is:
> > db> show intrcnt
> > cpu0: timer4510
> > irq256: hdac0 1
> > cpu3: timer 29
> > cpu1: timer 3036
> > cpu2: timer 31
> > db>
> >
> > I did break at the mountfrom> prompt
> > If I break before I only have the cpu0 and irq256 entries.
>
> Hmmm, is there any w
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 15:44:51 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:40:20 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:03:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:14:12 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 1:40:20 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:03:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:14:12 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, Jo
On Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:03:47 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:14:12 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin
On Monday, July 25, 2011 6:14:12 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >>> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 21:49:44 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wr
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 19:37:36 +, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wr
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 15:19:42 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable
On Monday, July 25, 2011 2:42:59 pm Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable to 9-current lead be
> >> to
> >> some importan
On Mon, 25 Jul 2011 13:09:04 -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
Hi,
Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable to 9-current lead be
to
some important problems.
I'm have tried both from sources (svn buildworld etc.) and from
memdisk
p
On Sunday, July 24, 2011 9:48:02 am Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable to 9-current lead be to
> some important problems.
>
> I'm have tried both from sources (svn buildworld etc.) and from memdisk
> provided by allbsd.org.
>
> The motherboard is
Hi,
Trying to upgrade one of my box from 8-stable to 9-current lead be to
some important problems.
I'm have tried both from sources (svn buildworld etc.) and from memdisk
provided by allbsd.org.
The motherboard is ASUS P5N-E SLI ACPI BIOS Revision 0901
more informations here :
http://peop
23 matches
Mail list logo