> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
> > not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
>
> No specific reason for these two:
>
> > - if_cxgb
> > - if_cxgbe
>
> But I do prefer to
Quoting Scott Long (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012 08:42:39 -0700):
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012
17:45:04 -0700):
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs
On Feb 22, 2012, at 1:22 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700):
>
>> On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not
>>> be) in GENERIC (at
Quoting Marius Strobl (from Tue, 21 Feb
2012 23:42:52 +0100):
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:40PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware
Quoting Navdeep Parhar (from Wed, 22 Feb 2012
01:55:40 +):
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:44:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a specific reason that
Quoting Scott Long (from Tue, 21 Feb 2012 17:45:04 -0700):
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or
shall not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 05:44:01PM -0700, Scott Long wrote:
>
> On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
> >> not be) in
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
> not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
> - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
> - if_cxgb
> - if_cxgbe
Last time I t
On Feb 21, 2012, at 10:51 AM, Navdeep Parhar wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
>> not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
>
> No specific reason for these two:
>
>> -
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:56 AM, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not be)
> in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
> - if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
> - if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x8
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 03:56:56PM +0100, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
> not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
No specific reason for these two:
> - if_cxgb
> - if_cxgbe
But I do prefer to load them as modules (an
On 02/21/12 09:56, Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall not
be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
<>
- if_mxge
<>
Speaking for mxge, it requires the better part of 1MB worth of
firmware files, and it is a rather uncommon
Hi,
is there a specific reason that the following NICs are not (or shall
not be) in GENERIC (at least on i386)?
- if_cas: is compiled as a module, Sun hardware, non-x86 only?
- if_cxgb
- if_cxgbe
- if_gem: is compiled as a module, Apple/Sun, non-x86 only?
- if_hme: is compiled as a module
13 matches
Mail list logo