> Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 23:21:56 -0500 (EST)
> From: "Matthew N. Dodd" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> > After DP2 was released, PCCARDs were no longer recognized by IBM
> > ThinkPads in the 600 series. I just get:
> >
> > pccard1: Card has no functions!
> > cbb1
On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Kevin Oberman wrote:
> After DP2 was released, PCCARDs were no longer recognized by IBM
> ThinkPads in the 600 series. I just get:
>
> pccard1: Card has no functions!
> cbb1: PC Card card activation failed
either set from the loader or add to /boot/device.hints
hw.cbb.start_me
After DP2 was released, PCCARDs were no longer recognized by IBM
ThinkPads in the 600 series. I just get:
pccard1: Card has no functions!
cbb1: PC Card card activation failed
Has there been any progress on this? It's really painful having to
burn every file onto a CD to get it there.
R. Kevin Ob
Yes, devd is kinda hardwired at the moment. I have some changes in my
tree that I need to finish up before the release.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Dear Warner and Hackers,
--- "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maksim Yevmenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : > :
> : > : Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) "devd" can
TED]> writes:
: > : Dear Warner and Hackers,
: > :
: > : Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) "devd" can
: > : prevent "sio" driver from attaching to *ANY* pc-card
: > : that has PCCARD_FUNCTION_SERIAL?
: >
: > Sure. Just have sio_pccard_match retur
Dear Warner and Hackers,
--- "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Maksim Yevmenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Dear Warner and Hackers,
> :
> : Is there any way (on -current with NEWCAR
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Maksim Yevmenkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Dear Warner and Hackers,
:
: Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) "devd" can
: prevent "sio" driver from attaching to *ANY* pc-card
: that has PCCARD_FU
Dear Warner and Hackers,
Is there any way (on -current with NEWCARD) "devd" can
prevent "sio" driver from attaching to *ANY* pc-card
that has PCCARD_FUNCTION_SERIAL?
>From what i understand "devd" can load driver modules,
but it only comes to play when ca
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: BTW, I think that some developers are interested in devd.
: Do we have mailing list for it?
Not currently. I can create one if people are interested.
I've also been thinking of a good way we can have the ab
Hi,
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I've implemented pccardc power and boot_deactivated support code for
> : NEWCARD. They are needed for some mobile users including me.
> :
> : - Add pccardc pow
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: < said:
: > I used to use one. The dc(4) driver was broken a while back and
: > now has issues with this card that it didn't used to have, but it
: > should mostly work (it just needs to be ifconfig'd down an
< said:
> I used to use one. The dc(4) driver was broken a while back and
> now has issues with this card that it didn't used to have, but it
> should mostly work (it just needs to be ifconfig'd down and up when
> it freezes sometimes). You do need the dc(4) driver in your kernel
> or kldload th
On 29-Oct-2002 M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>: Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following
>: messages:
>:
>: cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59
>: cardbus1: Resource not specified i
On 29-Oct-2002 Garrett Wollman wrote:
> Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following
> messages:
>
> cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59
> cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100
> cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, size=400
> cardbus1: (
e implemented pccardc power and boot_deactivated support code for
> NEWCARD. They are needed for some mobile users including me.
>
> - Add pccardc power support code. Yes, it's OLDCARD compatible.
> - Add new loader tunable hw.cbb.boot_deactivated to prevent pccards
>
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mitsuru IWASAKI <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I've implemented pccardc power and boot_deactivated support code for
: NEWCARD. They are needed for some mobile users including me.
:
: - Add pccardc power support code. Yes, it
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Garrett Wollman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following
: messages:
:
: cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59
: cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100
: cardbus1: Resource not
Has anyone managed to make one of these work? I get the following
messages:
cardbus1: Expecting link target, got 0x59
cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100
cardbus1: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, size=400
cardbus1: (vendor=0x1737, dev=0xab09) at 0.0 irq 11
cbb1: CardBu
Hi,
I've implemented pccardc power and boot_deactivated support code for
NEWCARD. They are needed for some mobile users including me.
- Add pccardc power support code. Yes, it's OLDCARD compatible.
- Add new loader tunable hw.cbb.boot_deactivated to prevent pccards
from
Dear Hackers,
after upgrading to the recent (as of this weekend) -current i'm
having a 100% reproducible panic.
the card i'm trying to make to work is
RealPort Ethernet 10/100 + Modem56 (REM56G-100)
it does work in Linux in W2K, it did not work before upgrade,
but at least it did not panic.
i
Morning all ...
I'm finally trying to get my laptop back up and running using
-CURRENT ... back on August 16th, I did an upgrade that totally hosed the
ability to use my ethernet, and due to the way that I erroneously did the
upgrade, I can't go back to the old kernel :(
I've sea
>>> On Thu, 18 Jul 2002 09:50:54 -0600 (MDT), "M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Hideyuki KURASHINA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : Jul 19 00:34:49 hoge pccardd[1363]: driver allocation failed for MELCO(LPC3-TX):
>Inappropriate ioctl for
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hideyuki KURASHINA <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Jul 19 00:34:49 hoge pccardd[1363]: driver allocation failed for MELCO(LPC3-TX):
:Inappropriate ioctl for device
recompile pccardd. The inappropriate ioctl for device is due to a
slight mismatch betwe
... everything boots fine,
> : but my ethernet no longer exists (it worked great on my June 6th kernel)
> : ...
>
> Used to work for me, but something seems to have busted it in recent
> versions of the kernel. So NEWCARD appears to be broken for ata, sio
> and ed. Wonderful.
On Thu, Jul 18, 2002 at 08:52:43AM -0600, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> : I think the "ed" problem is that without pccardd, the 0x8 flag
> : is no longer being passed to the driver, so it doesn't try probing
> : it
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ian Dowse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: I think the "ed" problem is that without pccardd, the 0x8 flag
: is no longer being passed to the driver, so it doesn't try probing
: it as a Linksys card (I haven't checked for sure, but that would
: be consis
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "M. Warner Losh" writes:
>Used to work for me, but something seems to have busted it in recent
>versions of the kernel. So NEWCARD appears to be broken for ata, sio
>and ed. Wonderful. These all used to work at one point in the past.
I
omething seems to have busted it in recent
versions of the kernel. So NEWCARD appears to be broken for ata, sio
and ed. Wonderful. These all used to work at one point in the past.
Time to try to block out a chunk of time for dealing with them.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTEC
On Wednesday, July 17, 2002, at 10:24 AM, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
>
> Just upgraded my laptop to the latest -CURRENT ... everything boots
> fine,
> but my ethernet no longer exists (it worked great on my June 6th kernel)
> ...
>
> I'm using NEWCARD support in the k
Just upgraded my laptop to the latest -CURRENT ... everything boots fine,
but my ethernet no longer exists (it worked great on my June 6th kernel)
...
I'm using NEWCARD support in the kernel, and if_ed is loaded according to
kldstat ...
I've searched Google, and nadda there ... kno
> : 1) When trying to insert a Cisco Aironet 340 adapter, I get thrown to
> the : db> prompt after it has found the card (which it seems to do
> nicely). If I : boot with it inserted, I only get to the detection, then
> the boot stops. At : boot up dmesg says the following on the bridge :
> :
Thus spake Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Uhm, I am kinda new to this, so I have no idea how to get that to disk from
> the debugger...:(
>
> However, the error I get is "Fatal trap 19: non-maskable interrupt trap
> while in kernel mode".
>
> If someone could help point me to how t
> : Now I ofcourse have two additional questions
> :
> : 1) When trying to insert a Cisco Aironet 340 adapter, I get thrown to
> the : db> prompt after it has found the card (which it seems to do
> nicely). If I : boot with it inserted, I only get to the detection, then
> the boot stops. At
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Kurt Erik Lindqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
:
: --On Tuesday, July 09, 2002 23:47:09 -0700 Julian Elischer
: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
:
: > the new code has been tweeked for gcc 3.1
: >
: > in 3.1 you need foo[]
: > in 2.95 you needed foo[0]
--On Tuesday, July 09, 2002 23:47:09 -0700 Julian Elischer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> the new code has been tweeked for gcc 3.1
>
> in 3.1 you need foo[]
> in 2.95 you needed foo[0]
>
> you can follow the instructions in /usr/src/Makefile
> specifically the make buildkernel bit
> to make bot
:
[...]
> ../../../sys/proc.h:117: field `ar_args' has incomplete type
> *** Error code 1
>
> Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NEWCARD.
> *** Error code 1
>
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
/genassym.c:46:
../../../sys/proc.h:117: field `ar_args' has incomplete type
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NEWCARD.
*** Error code 1
Stop in /usr/src/sys/i386/compile/NEWCARD.
I assume this is known or I am stupid? :)
- kurtis -
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROT
I'm still using old 16bit Linksys card and it's not working with
newcard. Otherwise newcard is just fine with my Toshiba 3440 when
using Cisco Aironet 340. Newcard don't detect Linksys as it should.
Is anyone using this card?
--- newcard ---
Jun 30 14:58:38 phb kernel: ed0:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"Brian F. Feldman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: "Scott Penno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
: > I removed apm from the kernel which appeared to be playing having with acpi
: > and things are now working a treat. The card works fine, however I do
: > recei
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Takanori Watanabe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: 3. Add following line to configuration file. (Should it be standard?)
: ==
: device cardcom
They should be standard. I have a patch that does this for all the
_if* files in the system, with a bloatage of
from configuration file.
3. Add following line to configuration file. (Should it be standard?)
==
device cardcom
==
4. Rebuild your kernel.
5. Move /sys/modules/ and build oldcard, pccbb, pccard, cardbus, pcic
module and install them.
6 Reboot.
7 If you want to use oldcard, type as follows in loader(8).
==
l
"Scott Penno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I removed apm from the kernel which appeared to be playing having with acpi
> and things are now working a treat. The card works fine, however I do
> receive the following message, 'cardbus0: (vendor=0x115d,
> dev=0x0103) at 0.1 irq 5'. I've had a look
couldn't find a resolution. Is this a real drama and if so, how do I
correct it?
Regards,
Scott
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Penno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, May 06, 2002 8:54 PM
Subject: Problem
On Mon, May 06, 2002 at 08:54:01PM +1000, Scott Penno wrote:
Hi,
> Just an update. I've tried three different 32 bit cards and every time the
> card was inserted the laptop locked up. I recompiled the kernel without the
> miibus and dc and then inserted the Xircom card the laptop would appear
. Any ideas?
Scott.
- Original Message -
From: "Scott Penno" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, May 05, 2002 12:27 AM
Subject: Problems with Dell Inspiron 2500/NEWCARD/Xircom CBEM56G [DRAFT]
> Hi there,
>
&g
ption PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE with
NEWCARD, I'm unable to
acheive any card functionality, when compiled with this option the 16 bit
3Com card works fine but the 32bit Xircom card causes a lockup. Interesting
to note also that under Windows XP and FreeBSD 4.X the bridge is detected as
an OZ6933, while under
On Thu, 11 Apr 2002, Klaus Leibrandt wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> I just tried the Developers Preview 1, and was really looking forwards to
> the new cardbus support. But while booting I now get the following
(ACPI is disabled!!!):
> pccbb0: at device 10.0 on pci0
> cardbus0: on pccbb0
> pccard0: <1
Hello.
I just tried the Developers Preview 1, and was really looking forwards to
the new cardbus support. But while booting I now get the following (ACPI
disabled, funny messages show up if enabled):
pccbb0: at device 10.0 on pci0
cardbus0: on pccbb0
pccard0: <16-bit PCCard bus> on pccbb0
pci
| It isn't a huge effort conceptutally, but there is a lot of
| infrastructure that CardBus depends on that isn't in -stable or only
| partially MFC'd. If someone wanted to start cranking on it, they
| could get it done in a few weeks worth of work.
Where would be a good place to start?
jm
--
On Tue, Feb 12, 2002 at 10:33:25AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
| In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| : So the idea is that drivers will be modules dynamically loaded based on
| : the hints file?
|
| Not currently. But someone could come in and
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: So the idea is that drivers will be modules dynamically loaded based on
: the hints file?
Not currently. But someone could come in and do that project.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wi
| : Is the hints file going to become standard, or is it just a tool to
| : help developers writing drivers for -current?
|
| It is standard in current, so in 5.0-release and newer people will
| have to cope.
So the idea is that drivers will be modules dynamically loaded based on
the hints file?
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
:
: | In -current look at /boot/device.hints. In stable this is still in
: | the kernel config file.
:
: Is the hints file going to become standard, or is it just a tool to
: help developers writing drivers for
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: | Maybe hints consume ed0 and sio0 likely.
:
: So, the game is afoot! Is there anything I can do to help track this
: down?
In -current look at /boot/device.hints. In stable this is still in
the kernel config
| In -current look at /boot/device.hints. In stable this is still in
| the kernel config file.
Is the hints file going to become standard, or is it just a tool to
help developers writing drivers for -current?
jm
--
My other computer is your windows box.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL P
| : When my laptop is booting (Toshiba with ToPIC97, NoteWorthy modem,
| : LinkSys modem card) something odd happens:
| :
| : IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding
| : disabled
| : , default to accept, unlimited logging
| : pccard: card inserted, slot 0
| : pccar
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
j mckitrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 03:56:00PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
: | NEWCARD is up and running, but has issues for some cards, bridges and
: | lacks some useful features.
:
: That reminds me, there w
On Mon, Feb 11, 2002 at 03:56:00PM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
| NEWCARD is up and running, but has issues for some cards, bridges and
| lacks some useful features.
That reminds me, there was something I noticed on my system you might
want to be aware of. :-)
First, everything works fine, or
s and client devieces. This is what
| I've been calling NEWCARD.
Ah, this was the part I got mixed up. I thought Newcard was already up
and running with the last iteration of changes you made (remember me and
ToPIC on Toshiba? ;-) I thought this was already in -stable.
jm
--
My other comput
exca,cardbus,pccbb}/*. I'm in the process of fixing
: | bugs in this code base as well as removing redundant code and
: | expanding support for more bridges and client devieces. This is what
: | I've been calling NEWCARD.
:
: Ah, this was the part I got mixed up. I thought Newcard was al
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Miguel Mendez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: So, in your opinion, how hard would it be to MFC from a recent -CURRENT
: to 4.5-RELEASE? More or less importing the stuff and little fixing or is
: a major rewrite of some part needed? Because as it seems that
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Tom Fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: Warner, do you have any clues on how to get the modem half of this
: card working again?
You'd have to a) fix the pci attachment or b) wait until the puc
driver hits the tree. Chances are fixing the pci attachm
prised that card is using the dc driver instead of
>>>>
>>the
>>
>>>>xe driver. I thought all the Xircom ..em56 cards used xe. Is that
>>>>
>>how
>>
>>>>it was set up in pccard.conf?
>>>>
>>>>Greg
>&g
All,
Thank you for your support. The card should have been
recognized in NEWCARD. It is my fault that I thought
my Thinkpad was running NEWCARD but in fact was a
custom kernel without rl support. In addition, I did
not experience the hang that was mentioned by another
YAMAMOTO san.
--- Taku
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"M. Warner Losh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
: Shizuka Kudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: : kernel: found->vendor=0x10ec, dev=0x8138, revid=0x10
: ...
: : kernel: cardbus0: (vendor=0x10ec, dev=0x8138
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Shizuka Kudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: kernel: found->vendor=0x10ec, dev=0x8138, revid=0x10
...
: kernel: cardbus0: (vendor=0x10ec, dev=0x8138) at 0.0 irq 11.
Try adding this ID to the dc driver?
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL
At Tue, 15 Jan 2002 03:08:53 -0800 (PST),
Shizuka Kudo wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> Does anyone have tested whether this card works with
> current 5.0 NEWCARD? I tried it on a Thinkpad 600X
> with current 5.0 cvsupped yestersday and received a
>
> kernel: found->
>>>>> "Shizuka" == Shizuka Kudo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Shizuka> Does anyone have tested whether this card works with current 5.0
Shizuka> NEWCARD?
I already tested it on NEWCARD.
Melco LPC4-CLX-CB is using Realtek's chip.
So, we need to add vendo
Dear all,
Does anyone have tested whether this card works with
current 5.0 NEWCARD? I tried it on a Thinkpad 600X
with current 5.0 cvsupped yestersday and received a
kernel: pccbb0: card inserted: event=0x,
state=3920
kernel: pccbb0: pccbb_power: CARD_VCC_0V and
CARD_VPP_0V [44
27;s children. I will have to look at the code
Warner> more closely to see if I might be mistaken.
I re-write a patch for NEWCARD.
New patch is,
- detach children of cardbus/pccard devices at suspend time
- probe and attach children of cardbus/pccard devices at resume time
- pccbb devic
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yoichi NAKAYAMA writes:
: I think this trouble can be easily solved if we can controll
: PCCBB_START_IO as we can controll PCCBB_START_MEM by last change:
Yes. That would be true. I didn't do it with that commit. I'll go
ahead and do it for I/O. It may change be
> At Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:47:30 -0400,
> Jonathan Chen wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:26:16PM +0900, Yoichi NAKAYAMA wrote:
> > > I just cvsup'ed and buildkernel with NEWCARD.
> > > Then my note book doesn't recognize MAC address of the card(3CXFE575C
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> YAMAMOTO
Shigeru writes:
: I make a patch to support sio with NEWCARD.
: This patch is to avoid ghost interrupt when a PC-Card was removed.
:
: This patch has one assamption,
: - all Serial PC-Card have a 16450/16550 compatible interface.
Thi
Hi all,
I make a patch to support sio with NEWCARD.
This patch is to avoid ghost interrupt when a PC-Card was removed.
This patch has one assamption,
- all Serial PC-Card have a 16450/16550 compatible interface.
I tested it on my NotePC and there is no problems.
Please try it if you have
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Andy Sparrow writes:
: > Gotta love one problem report hitting 5 problems all at once :-)
:
: You do? :-/
Yes, and I wasn't even counting your sound problems :-)
hopefully I can resolve at least the interrupt routing issue soonish.
Would you be game to be a guinee
ed,
> but rather rejecting it.
>
> Until problem 1 is fixed, problem is moot for you. NEWCARD doesn't
> have the concept of polling, which is problem number 4 of 2, so you
> can't do the OLDCARD trick of using ISA interupts (which NEWCARD
> doesn't support either, probl
y asking the pci layer for a specific range, triggering an
allocation. That allocation is failing (the third of two problems :-)
because the bridge code isn't clipping the request to what's decoded,
but rather rejecting it.
Until problem 1 is fixed, problem is moot for you. NEWCARD d
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> YAMAMOTO
Shigeru writes:
: I make 2 patches for NEWCARD.
Wonderful!
: one is to supoort to suspend/resume PC Card devices on NEWCARD.
Hmmm. Something about this patch looks incorrect. Wouldn't it delete
the actual bus (eg pccard/cardbus)? I'd
Hi all,
I make 2 patches for NEWCARD.
one is to supoort to suspend/resume PC Card devices on NEWCARD.
other is to ignore ghost interrupt at ed driver when removing PC Card.
It is a quick hack and I only tested on my NotePC, Sony VAIO 818.
So I don't know my patches work fine on other N
Hi,
I build kernel with NEWCARD from source cvsup'ed today.
Following patch is still needed for my machine & card.
Without this, the card appear as
/boot/kernel/kernel: xl0: Ethernet address: 00:00:00:00:00:00
and the card does not work.
Best regards,
--
Yoichi NAKAYAMA
At Wed, 5 Se
Hi Warner,
I hope you can point me in the right direction or directly
answer the question I have. I'm an active -CURRENT user and
have aquired a Compaq WL100 wireless nic which does not work
with the 'NEWCARD' options defined. In order to get my 3Com
card to work, I need thes
My card(3CXFE575CT-JP) works well with your patch in the following.
Thanks.
--
Yoichi Nakayama
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Wed, 5 Sep 2001 11:47:30 -0400, Jonathan Chen wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:26:16PM +0900, Yoichi NAKAYAMA wrote:
>> I just cvsup'ed and buildkernel w
On Wed, Sep 05, 2001 at 11:51:07AM -0400, Jonathan Chen wrote:
> A complete dmesg from a verbose boot with both the successful and failed
> attempts would be a good start. It would also be useful to know what card
> you're using.
The card is a Lucent wavelan. I haven't tried this with another
On Tue, Sep 04, 2001 at 11:25:25AM +0200, Mark Santcroos wrote:
> Hi Warner,
>
> On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:24:31AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> > Looks like the mass commit broke stuff :-(
>
> I have a ToPIC100 chipset in my Toshiba Portege 3110CT.
>
> Last 'week' the updates broke my pcmcia su
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 08:26:16PM +0900, Yoichi NAKAYAMA wrote:
> I just cvsup'ed and buildkernel with NEWCARD.
> Then my note book doesn't recognize MAC address of the card(3CXFE575CT-JP)
> following are concerning log for new kernel and old kernel(cvsup'ed 2-3 weeks
Hi Warner,
On Mon, Sep 03, 2001 at 10:24:31AM -0600, Warner Losh wrote:
> Looks like the mass commit broke stuff :-(
I have a ToPIC100 chipset in my Toshiba Portege 3110CT.
Last 'week' the updates broke my pcmcia support partially.
Booting with a card inserted, inserted during boot or inserted
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Yoichi NAKAYAMA writes:
: I just cvsup'ed and buildkernel with NEWCARD.
: Then my note book doesn't recognize MAC address of the card(3CXFE575CT-JP)
: following are concerning log for new kernel and old kernel(cvsup'ed 2-3 weeks ago)
Looks
I just cvsup'ed and buildkernel with NEWCARD.
Then my note book doesn't recognize MAC address of the card(3CXFE575CT-JP)
following are concerning log for new kernel and old kernel(cvsup'ed 2-3 weeks ago)
Sep 3 20:08:43 yoichi-c1 /boot/kernel/kernel: pccbb0: card inserted:
e
On Fri, Aug 17, 2001 at 01:11:03AM -0700, Sam Habash wrote:
> Any good reason why the the patch in this PR hasn't yet been
> committed to the tree?
Can you clearify exactly what the problem is under newcard? Or is it just
not supporting the newcard interface? I'm using my ai
y with necessary good stuff, so no
hurry. :-)
Applying the patch listed in the PR doesn't quite result in
the Aironet card getting detected in NEWCARD, I guess the
pccard_compat_probe|attach stuff in dev/an/if_an_pccard.c doesn't
succeed (why?), so changing 'device interface'
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sam Habash writes:
: Any good reason why the the patch in this PR hasn't yet been
: committed to the tree?
lack of time on my part.
Warner
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Any good reason why the the patch in this PR hasn't yet been
committed to the tree?
Thanks for your consideration.
Take care,
--Sam
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On 17-Apr-01 Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:10:37PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>>
>> On 15-Apr-01 Jesper Skriver wrote:
>> > About every other time I boot my IBM ThinkPad 600E I get this panic
>> > (hand typed, as I don't have a second machine here to be able to use a
>> > se
On Mon, Apr 16, 2001 at 08:10:37PM -0700, John Baldwin wrote:
>
> On 15-Apr-01 Jesper Skriver wrote:
> > About every other time I boot my IBM ThinkPad 600E I get this panic
> > (hand typed, as I don't have a second machine here to be able to use a
> > serial console).
> >
> > Fatal trap 12: page
On 15-Apr-01 Jesper Skriver wrote:
> About every other time I boot my IBM ThinkPad 600E I get this panic
> (hand typed, as I don't have a second machine here to be able to use a
> serial console).
>
> Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
> Fault virtual address = 0x28
It's a null poin
About every other time I boot my IBM ThinkPad 600E I get this panic
(hand typed, as I don't have a second machine here to be able to use a
serial console).
Fatal trap 12: page fault while in kernel mode
Fault virtual address = 0x28
Fault code = supervisor read, page
Hi,
I recently updated my laptop (dell latitude CSx) from a 20010115-CURRENT
snapshot (using cvsup/make world), and NEWCARD is now giving me some
problems.. (I'm up to date as of 3/30 at this point..)
if I boot to a NEWCARD kernel, it freezes just before the cardbus bridge
is probed.
On 29-Mar-01 Jesper Skriver wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:13:09PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
>> >
>> > Index: src/sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c
>> > ===
>> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c,v
>> > retrieving revision 1.
On Thu, Mar 29, 2001 at 01:13:09PM -0800, John Baldwin wrote:
> >
> > Index: src/sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c
> > ===
> > RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/pccbb/pccbb.c,v
> > retrieving revision 1.12
> > diff -u -r1.12 pccbb.c
> > --- src/s
1 - 100 of 126 matches
Mail list logo
