Boris Popov wrote:
> > Pending any significant issues, DEVFS will be made mandatory in
> > -current on july 1st so that we can start reaping the full
> > benefits of having it.
>
> I'm not sure if this move in the right direction.
> Current devfs implementation is weak compared to t
On Sun, 13 May 2001, Poul-Henning Kamp wrote:
> Log:
> Convert DEVFS from an "opt-in" to an "opt-out" option.
>
> If for some reason DEVFS is undesired, the "NODEVFS" option is
> needed now.
Right step.
> Pending any significant issues, DEVFS will be made mandatory in
> -
