* Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010903 03:47] wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>
> > The reason for the macro is that when the size paramter is a constant
> > there's an evil trick that makes selecting the malloc bucket really
> > cheap.
>
> That's not the reason. The siz
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
> * John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010902 20:23] wrote:
> > In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> > Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > sys/malloc.h says that the macro versions of MALLOC/FREE are
> > > deprecated however they are used all over the p
* John Polstra <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010902 20:23] wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
> Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > sys/malloc.h says that the macro versions of MALLOC/FREE are
> > deprecated however they are used all over the place. I belive that they
> > are cluttering and dont r
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Gersh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> sys/malloc.h says that the macro versions of MALLOC/FREE are
> deprecated however they are used all over the place. I belive that they
> are cluttering and dont really have a purpose. Does anybody else agree?
>
> If I were to m
sys/malloc.h says that the macro versions of MALLOC/FREE are
deprecated however they are used all over the place. I belive that they
are cluttering and dont really have a purpose. Does anybody else agree?
If I were to make up a patch for current removing all of them would
anybody care enough to
