Re: Linksys Revisted..

2000-03-15 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Tue, 14 Mar 2000, Jay Oliver wrote: > Ok... how is it possible to identify different revisions? As far as I can > tell, the cards are being reported to be identical, though they're almost > certainly not. And since they both worked fine under 'pn', will it be > possible in the future to have

Re: Linksys Revisted..

2000-03-14 Thread Jay Oliver
orking revision via dc? - Original Message - From: "Alex Zepeda" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Jay Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 14, 2000 10:29 PM Subject: Re: Linksys Revisted.. > Different "revisions

Re: Linksys Revisted..

2000-03-14 Thread Alex Zepeda
On Mon, 13 Mar 2000, Jay Oliver wrote: > dc0: port 0xde00-0xdeff mem > 0xdfffbf00-0xdfffbff > dc0: Ethernet address: 00:a0:cc:32:a6:31 Different "revisions" of the Linksys NICs use different chips, so problems that afflict one "revision" quite possibly have nothing to do with the other card wor

Linksys Revisted..

2000-03-13 Thread Jay Oliver
The other day, I posted a message about my Linksys card not working with the new dc driver in 4.0, but it works fine with 3.4 and the tulip driver in linux. A suggestion was that I check to see if the card was bad. I've went back and checked, and again, it works fine in 3.4. So somethings not s