Re: HEADSUP! change to atapi-cd driver and burncd

2001-02-15 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > This is because some sloppy firmware coders hasn't implemented the > > "test unit ready" command proberly, it return ready no matter what > > state the drive is in :( I've gotten ahold of one burner that has this > > problem and I'm trying to come up with a

Re: HEADSUP! change to atapi-cd driver and burncd

2001-02-15 Thread Kenneth Wayne Culver
> This is because some sloppy firmware coders hasn't implemented the > "test unit ready" command proberly, it return ready no matter what > state the drive is in :( I've gotten ahold of one burner that has this > problem and I'm trying to come up with a fix for it... Is this the same problem I wa

Re: HEADSUP! change to atapi-cd driver and burncd

2001-02-15 Thread Soren Schmidt
It seems Kent Hauser wrote: > Hi all, > > I've been getting errors with "burncd" that I've not seen before. > Specifically, I'm seeing the following: > > chapel-hill# burncd -f /dev/acd1c -s 4 blank data *1.iso fixate > blanking CD - 100 % done > burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCNEXTWRITEABLEADDR): Devi

Re: HEADSUP! change to atapi-cd driver and burncd

2001-02-15 Thread Kent Hauser
Hi all, I've been getting errors with "burncd" that I've not seen before. Specifically, I'm seeing the following: chapel-hill# burncd -f /dev/acd1c -s 4 blank data *1.iso fixate blanking CD - 100 % done burncd: ioctl(CDRIOCNEXTWRITEABLEADDR): Device busy chapel-hill# Trace messages from /

HEADSUP! change to atapi-cd driver and burncd

2001-01-10 Thread Soren Schmidt
The changes require that kernel and burncd are in sync... -Søren To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message