Re: Going to CURRENT from STABLE

2002-02-27 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:44:19 MST, "M. Warner Losh" wrote: > It was documented when you typed config: > You may need to use the make -DNO_WERROR flag if you hit unfixed warnings. Output from config(8) is lost in the noise when you use the buildkernel target. Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: sen

Re: Going to CURRENT from STABLE

2002-02-27 Thread M. Warner Losh
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Dimitar Peikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: : Well, I've decided to go to CURRENT from STABLE, but much of the : kernel sources break, because of -Werror. I solve my problem passing : NO_WERROR=1 on make command line, but this was not documented. :-=((

Re: Going to CURRENT from STABLE

2002-02-27 Thread Alfred Perlstein
* Dimitar Peikov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [020227 03:54] wrote: > > Well, I've decided to go to CURRENT from STABLE, but much of the > kernel sources break, because of -Werror. I solve my problem passing > NO_WERROR=1 on make command line, but this was not documented. :-=(( Since 5.x is a moving targ

Going to CURRENT from STABLE

2002-02-27 Thread Dimitar Peikov
Well, I've decided to go to CURRENT from STABLE, but much of the kernel sources break, because of -Werror. I solve my problem passing NO_WERROR=1 on make command line, but this was not documented. :-=(( -- Dimitar Peikov GnuPG key http://www.bgzone.com/~mitko/mitko.key.asc Key fingerpri