On Sat, Feb 08, 2003 at 06:03:53AM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of:
> Hiten Pandya wrote:
> >On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect
> >of:
> >
> >>Hiten Pandya wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi gang.
> >>>
> >>>Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I not
Hiten Pandya wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of:
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel...
I've been using extended sl
On Fri, Feb 07, 2003 at 07:49:54PM -0800, walt wrote the words in effect of:
> Hiten Pandya wrote:
> >Hi gang.
> >
> >Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
> >dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel...
>
> I've been using extended slices on
Hiten Pandya wrote:
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel...
I've been using extended slices on both -stable and -current for
quite a while without any problems, both with and without GEOM.
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Hiten Pandya writes:
>Hi gang.
>
>Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
>dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel. This
>is sorta bad, but I can bare for now.
>
>Also, I tried searching the sys/geom/ tree if th
Hi gang.
Recently removing the NO_GEOM option from my kernel; I noticed that my
dos extended slices dev entries disappeared under a GEOM kernel. This
is sorta bad, but I can bare for now.
Also, I tried searching the sys/geom/ tree if there was anything
relating to this, but could not find anythi
