Thank you! I see this fix in 9 STABLE.
Works)
2011/11/8 John Baldwin :
> On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:10:51 pm Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
>> 2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
>> RC2 is coming. Nothing cha
On Tuesday, November 08, 2011 2:10:51 pm Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
> 2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
> RC2 is coming. Nothing changed.
Sorry, haven't been able to merge them to 9 yet.
> 2011/10/25 John Ba
FreeBSD accessor 9.0-RC2 FreeBSD 9.0-RC2 #0: Tue Nov 8 20:52:11 MSK
2011 mox@accessor:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/GENERIC amd64
RC2 is coming. Nothing changed.
2011/10/25 John Baldwin :
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 7:21:27 pm Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
>> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wro
On Monday, October 24, 2011 7:21:27 pm Gunnar Schaefer wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
> >
> > GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "ca
on 24/10/2011 21:23 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> Also, perhaps edd_params_v3 and edd_params_v4 should inherit edd_params in
>> some
>> "smarter" way to avoid verbatim duplicates.
>
> Yeah, probably so. We will probably never ev
2011/10/24 Dimitry Andric
> On 2011-10-23 21:56, Dennis Koegel wrote:
>
>> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>>
>>> I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes
>>> to the
>>> array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
>>> Could you please
On Oct 24, 2011, at 2:40 PM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
>
> GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "cannot convert to a pointer type":
>
>v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
>
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 11:33:23AM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Perhaps try http://www.freebsd.org/~jhb/patches/edd_params.patch
GCC chokes here in drv.c:{49,50}: "cannot convert to a pointer type":
v86.ds = VTOPSEG(params);
v86.esi = VTOPOFF(params);
Changed this to ¶ms. Also ch
On Monday, October 24, 2011 12:25:09 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> >>> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote
on 24/10/2011 18:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
[snip]
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS
On Monday, October 24, 2011 9:47:42 am Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> > On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> >> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> >>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wr
on 24/10/2011 16:41 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
>>> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the C
On Sunday, October 23, 2011 1:57:59 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> > On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> >> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
> >> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1"
On Friday, October 21, 2011 5:37:16 pm Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> > on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> >> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev
On 2011-10-23 21:56, Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes to the
array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
Could you please test this hypothesis by trying the following patch?
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 08:57:59PM +0300, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> I found a document that suggests a possibility of BIOS writing more bytes to
> the
> array than its current size of 0x42: [...]
> Could you please test this hypothesis by trying the following patch?
With -O1 and this patch, it boots.
on 23/10/2011 18:27 Dennis Koegel said the following:
> On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
>> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1" to "-Os -mrtd" (partially
>> reverting
>> an earlier commit) fix
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 04:33:38PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
> Working offline with Dennis, we found that changing the CFLAGS in
> sys/boot/i386/gptboot/Makefile from "-O1" to "-Os -mrtd" (partially reverting
> an earlier commit) fixed gptboot. The next test for someone to do would be
> to
>
on 22/10/2011 01:22 Gunnar Schaefer said the following:
> On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
>> A litmus question: do those experiencing the trouble all have BTX_SERIAL
>> defined?
>
> Not sure where BTX_SERIAL would be defined, but I'm seeing the problem with
> the generic kernel.
On Oct 21, 2011, at 2:37 PM, Andriy Gapon wrote:
> on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
>> on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
>>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>
on 22/10/2011 00:27 Andriy Gapon said the following:
> on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
>> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
>>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smar
on 21/10/2011 23:33 John Baldwin said the following:
> On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
>>> as test. [...]
>>> It was fre
On Friday, October 21, 2011 4:58:51 am Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > But
On Oct 21, 2011, at 1:58 AM, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
>> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
>> as test. [...]
>> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
>> But after reboot m
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:58:51AM +0200, Dennis Koegel wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > Bu
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > But after reboot my server don't boo
2011/10/21 Dennis Koegel
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> > I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i
> mirror)
> > as test. [...]
> > It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> > But after reboot my server don't boo
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 11:28:08AM +0400, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
> as test. [...]
> It was fresh install and I choose guided partitioning (GPT)
> But after reboot my server don't boot from hd.
We have the same issue on a
I used FreeBSD 9 amd64 on my HP Proliant DL360 G5 (smart array p400i mirror)
as test.
It was installed long time ago and often I did csup/rebuild.
Yesterday I updated it to 9.0-RC1 and everything was fine.
Today I downloaded BETA3 iso and tried to install it.
bsdinstall is good. CD ISO boots and i
29 matches
Mail list logo
