On Sun, 17 Oct 1999, Garrett Wollman wrote:
;-><
said:
;->
;->> This is going in the right direction, but here is a question (and I don't
;->> have the answer). Is it so much more easier to create new compile time
;->> directive than to go the extra step and use packages where they are
;->> avail
< said:
> This is going in the right direction, but here is a question (and I don't
> have the answer). Is it so much more easier to create new compile time
> directive than to go the extra step and use packages where they are
> available ? For example "bind8" is available as a package. Why not h
Hi,
From: Cy Schubert - ITSD Open Systems Group <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I was not talking about things that constitute the "real" core of the
> > distribution (kernel, basic libraries etc.). I was more thinking about
> > "userland" stuff that is included in the distribution but might not be
> > r
In message <011801bf159c$f80630e0$[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, "Patrick Bihan-
Faou" writes:
> Hi,
>
> From: Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > There are a _lot_ of pitfalls to this kind of approach, as I have
> > discovered using Linux Debian. This would probably open a can of
> > worms you have n
Hi,
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> There are a _lot_ of pitfalls to this kind of approach, as I have
> discovered using Linux Debian. This would probably open a can of
> worms you have no idea of. IMHO, the single biggest mistake in
> Debian is the all-encompassing package system w
Pierre Beyssac wrote:
> [ -security trimmed from Cc: ]
>
> On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 11:11:43AM -0400, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> > >pkg_delete lp
> > >pkg_delete yp
> > >
> > >Has anyone done/tried this in the past, and if so, what was the
> > > reaction? Or what do people think? I
Hi,
From: Pierre Beyssac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> There are a _lot_ of pitfalls to this kind of approach, as I have
> discovered using Linux Debian. This would probably open a can of
> worms you have no idea of. IMHO, the single biggest mistake in
> Debian is the all-encompassing package system whi
[ -security trimmed from Cc: ]
On Wed, Oct 13, 1999 at 11:11:43AM -0400, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> >pkg_delete lp
> >pkg_delete yp
> >
> >Has anyone done/tried this in the past, and if so, what was the
> > reaction? Or what do people think? I realize this sounds a bit like the
> >
On Wed, 13 Oct 1999, Patrick Bihan-Faou wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> >It strikes me that having the base system be slightly more decomposed
> > could be advantageous. It would be great to be able to do something like:
> >
> >pkg_delete lp
> >pkg_delete yp
> >
> >Has anyone done/tried th
Hi All,
>It strikes me that having the base system be slightly more decomposed
> could be advantageous. It would be great to be able to do something like:
>
>pkg_delete lp
>pkg_delete yp
>
>Has anyone done/tried this in the past, and if so, what was the
> reaction? Or what do pe
10 matches
Mail list logo