Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote:
> Ken McKittrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As I said, works fine with 4.7. I'm sure it's something 5.0-current
> > specific. I'm currently processing 500K emails per day with this
> > setup. :)
>
> Your configuration relies on a long-standing bug in the networking
Ken McKittrick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I said, works fine with 4.7. I'm sure it's something 5.0-current
> specific. I'm currently processing 500K emails per day with this
> setup. :)
Your configuration relies on a long-standing bug in the networking
stack, which caused FreeBSD to accept p
Terry
I meant to say LVS/DR. Not LVS/Nat or LVS/Tun. The RealServers/Back-End
machines reply directly back to the client.
As I said, works fine with 4.7. I'm sure it's something 5.0-current
specific. I'm currently processing 500K emails per day with this setup.
:)
Hmmm, I think I need to run
Ken McKittrick wrote:
> I've got a FreeBSD5.0-R machine that doesn't work with Linux Virtual
> Server. This is for SMTP and WWW services.
>
> I'm using LVS-Direct Routing. The LVS machine has the 66.218.0.54 Real
> IP and 66.218.0.58 and 66.218.0.59 as Virtual IP's. The FreeBSD machine
> has 66.21
Hello
I've got a FreeBSD5.0-R machine that doesn't work with Linux Virtual
Server. This is for SMTP and WWW services.
I'm using LVS-Direct Routing. The LVS machine has the 66.218.0.54 Real
IP and 66.218.0.58 and 66.218.0.59 as Virtual IP's. The FreeBSD machine
has 66.218.0.28 and a Real IP on
