On Tue, Sep 25, 2001 at 11:27:58AM +0900, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> > >
> > > It uses the boot programs in /boot. So, even if we change boot0 and/or
> > > mbr, the new sysinstall includes old one. And, it breaks cross
> > > building, too.
> > >
> >
> > I'm not sure this is the right way to d
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Marcel Moolenaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:53:16PM +0900, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
> >
> > It uses the boot programs in /boot. So, even if we change boot0 and/or
> > mbr, the new sysinstall includes old one. And, it breaks cross
> >
On 24-Sep-01 Marcel Moolenaar wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:53:16PM +0900, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
>>
>> It uses the boot programs in /boot. So, even if we change boot0 and/or
>> mbr, the new sysinstall includes old one. And, it breaks cross
>> building, too.
>>
>> I have made the patc
On Mon, Sep 24, 2001 at 04:53:16PM +0900, Takahashi Yoshihiro wrote:
>
> It uses the boot programs in /boot. So, even if we change boot0 and/or
> mbr, the new sysinstall includes old one. And, it breaks cross
> building, too.
>
> I have made the patch to fix this problem. It adds a new target "b
current sysinstall building has a problem.
It uses the boot programs in /boot. So, even if we change boot0 and/or
mbr, the new sysinstall includes old one. And, it breaks cross
building, too.
I have made the patch to fix this problem. It adds a new target "boot"
into Makefile.inc1. Because, the
