On 02/05/2015 07:25 AM, John Baldwin wrote:
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:37:55 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:15:04AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:33:36 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:50:22PM -0600, Eric B
On Thursday, February 05, 2015 10:37:55 AM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:15:04AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:33:36 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:50:22PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
> > > > On 02/02/2015 03:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 10:15:04AM -0500, John Baldwin wrote:
> On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:33:36 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:50:22PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
> > > On 02/02/2015 03:30 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:38:29PM -
On Tuesday, February 03, 2015 10:33:36 PM Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:50:22PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
> > On 02/02/2015 03:30 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:38:29PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
> > >> On 01/31/2015 09:36 AM, Konstantin Bel
On 02/03/2015 02:33 PM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:50:22PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
On 02/02/2015 03:30 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:38:29PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
On 01/31/2015 09:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
First, shouldn't
On Mon, Feb 02, 2015 at 09:50:22PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
>
> On 02/02/2015 03:30 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:38:29PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
> >> On 01/31/2015 09:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> >>> First, shouldn't the kve_type changed to KVME_TYPE_VNOD
On 02/02/2015 03:30 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:38:29PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
On 01/31/2015 09:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
First, shouldn't the kve_type changed to KVME_TYPE_VNODE as well ?
My thinking is no, because KVME_TYPE_SWAP is in fact the correc
On Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 08:38:29PM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
>
> On 01/31/2015 09:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
> > First, shouldn't the kve_type changed to KVME_TYPE_VNODE as well ?
> My thinking is no, because KVME_TYPE_SWAP is in fact the correct type;
> I'd opine that it is better to be t
On 01/31/2015 09:36 AM, Konstantin Belousov wrote:
First, shouldn't the kve_type changed to KVME_TYPE_VNODE as well ?
My thinking is no, because KVME_TYPE_SWAP is in fact the correct type;
I'd opine that it is better to be transparent than make it look like
there is an OBJT_VNODE object there.
On Sat, Jan 31, 2015 at 09:07:23AM -0600, Eric Badger wrote:
> In FreeBSD 9, examining the VM map of a process (with e.g. 'procstat
> -v') with a tmpfs file mapped showed a VNODE type and displayed the file
> path. In 10.0 up to CURRENT (I believe this started at r250030), instead
> SWAP is show
In FreeBSD 9, examining the VM map of a process (with e.g. 'procstat
-v') with a tmpfs file mapped showed a VNODE type and displayed the file
path. In 10.0 up to CURRENT (I believe this started at r250030), instead
SWAP is shown without a filepath.
This has some unfortunate consequences; I dis
11 matches
Mail list logo