Re: Error question

2013-03-14 Thread Daniel Nebdal
How does your make.conf and src.conf look? On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 3:49 PM, Charlie Jones wrote: > I am trying to upgrade to 9.1-RELEASE > > uname -a > > FreeBSD havoc.innerlightcorp.com 8.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: > Mon May 30 12:58:18 MDT 2011 > r...@havoc.innerlightcorp.com:/usr/

Error question

2013-03-14 Thread Charlie Jones
I am trying to upgrade to 9.1-RELEASE uname -a FreeBSD havoc.innerlightcorp.com 8.2-RELEASE-p2 FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p2 #0: Mon May 30 12:58:18 MDT 2011 r...@havoc.innerlightcorp.com:/usr/obj/usr/src/sys/CUSTOM amd64 I received these messages at the end of the make buildworld process. Is it s

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-22 Thread walt
Tim Robbins wrote: > On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote: > > >>walt wrote: >> >> >>>My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder >>>was modified in March of 2001(?) >> >>David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' >>is completely differe

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-22 Thread Tim Robbins
On Sat, Sep 21, 2002 at 08:21:15PM -0700, walt wrote: > walt wrote: > > > My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder > > was modified in March of 2001(?) > > David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' > is completely different in -STABLE, which I've j

Re: libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-21 Thread walt
walt wrote: > My guess is that the syntax of 'sort' has changed since lorder > was modified in March of 2001(?) David Wolfskill just pointed out to me that the behavior of 'sort' is completely different in -STABLE, which I've just confirmed. Does anyone else see this behavior in -CURRENT? What

libc error question answered (partly)

2002-09-21 Thread walt
The source of the "sort: open failed: +1: No such file or directory" message during compilation of libc is the shellscript /usr/bin/lorder. /usr/bin/lorder contains these lines: # sort symbols and references on the first field (the symbol) sort +1 $R -o $R sort +1 $S -o $S My guess is that the