On 08-Apr-99 Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami wrote:
> * Weird that CoolEdit is on that list.
> *
> * I built both 3.8.3 and 3.9.0 by hand here using gcc and egcs, both
> work
> * a-ok after patching up ltconfig to make shared libs.
>
> Did you click on the links to see what it's complaining abou
* Weird that CoolEdit is on that list.
*
* I built both 3.8.3 and 3.9.0 by hand here using gcc and egcs, both work
* a-ok after patching up ltconfig to make shared libs.
Did you click on the links to see what it's complaining about?
"It worked here" doesn't mean much in this context, as the
On 07-Apr-99 Satoshi - the Wraith - Asami wrote:
> Errors are starting to appear in
>
> http://bento.freebsd.org/~asami/errorlogs/4-latest/
Weird that CoolEdit is on that list.
I built both 3.8.3 and 3.9.0 by hand here using gcc and egcs, both work
a-ok after patching up ltconfig to make share
> The 19990407 4.0-snap should be gold (well silver as we are still using
> the worse of the excptions stack unwinding method, jdp and I will change
> this soon)
That snap and those following it are pending... Peter broke the
compat lib stuff last night so the snaps are falling over again. :)
-
* From: "David O'Brien"
* I don't believe there are any C++ programs in XFree86, so you would be
* Ok. You would have noticed that C++ programs would not link.
Ok, thanks. BTW, the list of ports that built in 3.1 but failed in
4.0 are in
http://bento.freebsd.org/~asami/errorlogs/4-latest-3
> By the way, do I need to rebuild the private XFree86 package when I
> grab a better snap or is that not necessary? (That part is not
> automatic)
I don't believe there are any C++ programs in XFree86, so you would be
Ok. You would have noticed that C++ programs would not link.
--
-- Dav
* From: "David O'Brien"
* I wouldn't trust that 4.0-snap. That one should have a broken
* /usr/lib/libstdc++. I can send you working versions if you need.
*
* The 19990407 4.0-snap should be gold (well silver as we are still using
* the worse of the excptions stack unwinding method, jdp
> I don't know about the bootstrapping problems but 4.0-snaps started
> showing up again on current.freebsd.org today (19990406)
I wouldn't trust that 4.0-snap. That one should have a broken
/usr/lib/libstdc++. I can send you working versions if you need.
The 19990407 4.0-snap should be gold (
* From: "David O'Brien"
*
* Hi all,
*
* I just committed a fix to the libstdc++ errors people see on the initial
* bootstrap from gcc 2.7.2 to EGCS. AFAIK, there are *NO* remaining
* bootstrap problems.
I don't know about the bootstrapping problems but 4.0-snaps started
showing up again
On Wed, Apr 07, 1999 at 12:51:50AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> AFAIK, there are *NO* remaining bootstrap problems.
NOTE, I am assuming one is *NOT* using the "-j" option.
--
-- David(obr...@nuxi.com -or- obr...@freebsd.org)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsu
Hi all,
I just committed a fix to the libstdc++ errors people see on the initial
bootstrap from gcc 2.7.2 to EGCS. AFAIK, there are *NO* remaining
bootstrap problems.
If anybody has *ANY* bootstraping problems going from a pre-April 1st
-CURRENT to the latest and greatest I want to hear about it
11 matches
Mail list logo
