: And now I recall. Peter told me that at some
: point there will be no sys/modules at all.
I'm not objecting. We don't use sys/modules, but do use bsd.kmod.mk
to build our drivers outside of the sys tree. Any successor to
sys/modules must allow this (ideally with the same makefiles we have
no
On Mon, Dec 24, 2001 at 12:05:39AM -0700, M. Warner Losh wrote:
> > I'd like to drop bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk,
> > because I was told by someone (peter?) that this is
> > the right direction. :-)
>
> We use it slightly at Timing Solutions, but it is more of a pain than
> a blessing.
> I'd like to drop bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk,
> because I was told by someone (peter?) that this is
> the right direction. :-)
We use it slightly at Timing Solutions, but it is more of a pain than
a blessing. More of our module Makefiles have NOMAN than don't, by a
wide margin.
Warne
Hi!
I'd like to drop bsd.man.mk support from bsd.kmod.mk,
because I was told by someone (peter?) that this is
the right direction. :-)
Objections?
Cheers,
--
Ruslan Ermilov Oracle Developer/DBA,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sunbay Software AG,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] FreeBSD commi
