On Mon, 29 Oct 2018 at 04:36, Jan Beich wrote:
> Graham Perrin writes:
>
> > - is this DEFAULT_VERSIONS= line correct/sufficient for
> > Thunderbird etc. to be built with the inferior version of icu?
> >
> > DEFAULT_VERSIONS= icu=62.1_2,1
>
> Only one icu version is supported in the ports tree
Graham Perrin writes:
> - is this DEFAULT_VERSIONS= line correct/sufficient for
> Thunderbird etc. to be built with the inferior version of icu?
>
> DEFAULT_VERSIONS= icu=62.1_2,1
Only one icu version is supported in the ports tree, so the above is nop.
The ports are built against whatever ver
Thanks, people! devel/icu was the hint that I needed.
On Sun, 28 Oct 2018 at 23:26, Jan Beich wrote:
> … Either rebuild www/waterfox from the last revision before removal or
> downgrade devel/icu to 62.1 if nothing else requires 63.1. In the former
> case you can also update the port (adjust DIS
On 8/9/2012 8:26 AM, Chris Rees wrote:
> On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>>
>> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>>> On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new
2012/8/9 Chris Rees :
> On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>>
>> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
>> > On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> >> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
>> >> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg
On 7 Aug 2012 15:50, "O. Hartmann" wrote:
>
> On 08/07/12 15:39, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> >> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
> >> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg, everything
is
> >> going in
On 8/7/2012 4:31 AM, O. Hartmann wrote:
> ports-mgmt/portmaster installs still the old fashioned style folders of
> ports in /var/db/pkg. I thought ith the new scheme of pkg, everything is
> going into a file based SQLite3 DB?
Also ensure WITH_PKGNG=yes is in your /etc/make.conf. My last comment
s
nds" ends up in this:
>
>>>> Missing package dependencies were detected.
>>>> Found 2 issue(s) in total with your package database.
>
> The following packages will be installed:
>
> Installing pkg-config: 0.25_1
> Downgrading pci
total with your package database.
The following packages will be installed:
Installing pkg-config: 0.25_1
Downgrading pciids: 20120711 -> 20120625
Downgrading libdrm: 2.4.31_1 -> 2.4.17_1
Installing libGL: 7.6.1
Installing perl: 5.14.2_2
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> Um, what do you mean by "config file changes"? Of course
> you can't use stock 5.0-CURRENT config files, it's clear.
> As for config(8), it's in bootstrap-tools, and shouldn't
> be a problem. Buildkernel works fine here.
Configuration files, like /etc/pam.conf. For exam
On Thu, Jan 17, 2002 at 01:27:08AM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> > FWIW, modern -CURRENT's should be able to downgrade to -STABLE
> > without problems. If it's broken, please let me know, and I'll
> > fix it. I mean "if it WILL be broken", as tonight's -CURRENT
> > has su
Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> FWIW, modern -CURRENT's should be able to downgrade to -STABLE
> without problems. If it's broken, please let me know, and I'll
> fix it. I mean "if it WILL be broken", as tonight's -CURRENT
> has successfully built -STABLE. Didn't test the `installworld'
> part, but I d
On Wed, Jan 16, 2002 at 05:59:27PM -0800, Terry Lambert wrote:
> Timothy Aslat wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a
> > -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE?
> >
> > I'm just trying to
Timothy Aslat wrote:
>
> Hi All,
>
> Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a
> -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE?
>
> I'm just trying to avoid doing a reinstall and re-setup from scratch.
THis belongs on -questions.
In general, you ca
* Timothy Aslat ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a
> -CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE?
Well, that's going to be a hard one. If you have been running CURRENT
for a while, and compiling ports in CURRENT,
Hi All,
Quick question. Where would I find information on downgrading a
-CURRENT to a -STABLE or -RELEASE?
I'm just trying to avoid doing a reinstall and re-setup from scratch.
Regards
Tim
--
| The most exciting phrase to | Tim Aslat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> |
| hear in scien
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 06:35:40AM -0800, David Wolfskill wrote:
>
>Aye; feel free to holler if you find your machine wedged. It can be
>Very Helpful to have another "fallback" machine for various reasons
>
Hi
Well, after a couple of false starts, managed to downgrade successfully
and so fa
Having done this several times before, I highly recommend downgrading
via binary package.
Back up your system first!
Get your 4.4 CD, throw it in the drive, and see what happens.
As a rule this is not guaranteed to work, but if it doesn't then a
downgrade from source certainly won&
Hello List
Is there a guide or a how-to showing how to downgrade from a
5.0-CURRENT snapshot to 4.4-STABLE without having to blat the system and
start again? The reason 5.0 is on there is because only 5 had support for
the promise udma 100 tx2 card, but now that 4.4 has it, i would like to
downgr
19 matches
Mail list logo
