On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
[...]
> A more up-to-date schedule for the 14.0 release will be published in the
> near future, though nothing is yet set in stone.
>
> Thank you for your patience, and for any help in getting us through
> these outstanding items.
>
Ju
Am 2023-05-15 um 22:36 schrieb Yuri:
Yuri wrote:
Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2023-05-15 um 22:19 schrieb Yuri:
Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2023-05-15 um 21:37 schrieb Glen Barber:
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
Glen,
do you see any chance to get this finally merg
Yuri wrote:
> Michael Osipov wrote:
>> Am 2023-05-15 um 22:19 schrieb Yuri:
>>> Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2023-05-15 um 21:37 schrieb Glen Barber:
> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
>> Glen,
>>
>> do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
>
Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2023-05-15 um 22:19 schrieb Yuri:
>> Michael Osipov wrote:
>>> Am 2023-05-15 um 21:37 schrieb Glen Barber:
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Glen,
>
> do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
> https://bugs.fre
Am 2023-05-15 um 22:19 schrieb Yuri:
Michael Osipov wrote:
Am 2023-05-15 um 21:37 schrieb Glen Barber:
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
Glen,
do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236204 ?
It serious
Michael Osipov wrote:
> Am 2023-05-15 um 21:37 schrieb Glen Barber:
>> On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
>>> Glen,
>>>
>>> do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
>>> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236204 ?
>>>
>>> It seriously affects peop
Am 2023-05-15 um 21:37 schrieb Glen Barber:
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
Glen,
do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236204 ?
It seriously affects people (in enterprises) behind a proxy, curl will
On Mon, May 15, 2023 at 09:15:52PM +0200, Michael Osipov wrote:
> Glen,
>
> do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236204 ?
>
> It seriously affects people (in enterprises) behind a proxy, curl will
> be a problem and py-requests is a
Thanks Glen, no rush, quality first, it takes time :-)
--
CeDeROM, SQ7MHZ, http://www.tomek.cedro.info
Glen,
do you see any chance to get this finally merged:
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=236204 ?
It seriously affects people (in enterprises) behind a proxy, curl will
be a problem and py-requests is already a serious problem.
Michael
Mark Millard writes:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote on
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 07:53:09 UTC :
>
>> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>> > ...
>> > There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
>> > stable/14 in time, with that scheduled for May 12, 2023
> Am 03.05.2023 um 18:27 schrieb Glen Barber :
>
> On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 07:53:09AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>>> ...
>>> There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
>>> stable/14 in time, with that sch
On Wed, May 03, 2023 at 07:53:09AM +, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> > ...
> > There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
> > stable/14 in time, with that scheduled for May 12, 2023 with the above
> > points. That
On May 3, 2023, at 08:57, Mark Millard wrote:
> Alexey Dokuchaev wrote on
> Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 07:53:09 UTC :
>
>> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>>> ...
>>> There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
>>> stable/14 in time, with that sche
Alexey Dokuchaev wrote on
Date: Wed, 03 May 2023 07:53:09 UTC :
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> > ...
> > There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
> > stable/14 in time, with that scheduled for May 12, 2023 with the above
> > points. That
Am 2023-05-03 10:59, schrieb Mina Galić:
Is there a chance to get pkgbase into 14.0? If not it will take
another X years to have it in 15.0...
PkgBase *is* in 14, like it is in 13.
The question is just if re@ has the resources (people, time, Hardware)
to provide a Repository.
Mina Galić
Fing
> Is there a chance to get pkgbase into 14.0? If not it will take another X
> years to have it in 15.0...
PkgBase *is* in 14, like it is in 13.
The question is just if re@ has the resources (people, time, Hardware) to
provide a Repository.
Mina Galić
Am 2023-05-01 20:14, schrieb Glen Barber:
According to the 14.0-RELEASE schedule, the code slush in main and the
freeze to the KBI for 14.0 was scheduled for April 25, 2023. As some
of
you may have noticed, that did not happen.
First, and most importantly for 14.0, is the status of the OpenSS
On 3 May 2023, at 09:53, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote:
>
> On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
>> ...
>> There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
>> stable/14 in time, with that scheduled for May 12, 2023 with the above
>> points. That said, this is no
On Mon, May 01, 2023 at 06:14:49PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> ...
> There is no feasible way we are going to make the branch point of
> stable/14 in time, with that scheduled for May 12, 2023 with the above
> points. That said, this is not an all-inclusive list, but the more
> major items on our
According to the 14.0-RELEASE schedule, the code slush in main and the
freeze to the KBI for 14.0 was scheduled for April 25, 2023. As some of
you may have noticed, that did not happen.
First, and most importantly for 14.0, is the status of the OpenSSL
update to version 3. This in itself is reas
21 matches
Mail list logo
