Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-20 Thread Walter Hurry
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 01:07:26 +0200, Dimitry Andric wrote: > On Jun 6, 2013, at 18:21, Walter Hurry wrote: >> On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:19:20 -0600, asomers wrote: >>> Looks like a bug upstream. If this port worked in FreeBSD-9, then the >>> difference might be the switch from gcc to clang. You cou

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-07 Thread Walter Hurry
On Fri, 07 Jun 2013 13:58:50 -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: > Sorry for being so sparse, but I was just talking about general > impression from few tries I gave it. > > /proc wasn't main problem, usually I didn;t have any use for it. > > Basically it wasn't for me what it aimed to be- a frugal replace

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-07 Thread Jakub Lach
Sorry for being so sparse, but I was just talking about general impression from few tries I gave it. /proc wasn't main problem, usually I didn;t have any use for it. Basically it wasn't for me what it aimed to be- a frugal replacement for DE. Half of things didn't work, other half worked erra

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-06 Thread Dimitry Andric
On Jun 6, 2013, at 18:21, Walter Hurry wrote: > On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:19:20 -0600, asomers wrote: >> Looks like a bug upstream. If this port worked in FreeBSD-9, then the >> difference might be the switch from gcc to clang. You could try >> compiling the port with gcc. Just add these lines to

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-06 Thread Walter Hurry
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 08:37:10 -0700, Jakub Lach wrote: > Last time I've checked lxde was unfortunately not worth hassle. > > e.g. it depends on /proc > Sorry, I'm no expert, but is that a problem? I routinely mount proc on /proc in fstab. Is that what you are referring to? Is it undesirable to d

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-06 Thread Walter Hurry
On Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:19:20 -0600, asomers wrote: > Looks like a bug upstream. If this port worked in FreeBSD-9, then the > difference might be the switch from gcc to clang. You could try > compiling the port with gcc. Just add these lines to /etc/make.conf > > CC=gcc CXX=g++ > CPP=gcpp > >

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-06 Thread Jakub Lach
Last time I've checked lxde was unfortunately not worth hassle. e.g. it depends on /proc -- View this message in context: http://freebsd.1045724.n5.nabble.com/Can-t-compile-lxpanel-tp5817985p5818153.html Sent from the freebsd-current mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___

Re: Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-06 Thread asomers
Looks like a bug upstream. If this port worked in FreeBSD-9, then the difference might be the switch from gcc to clang. You could try compiling the port with gcc. Just add these lines to /etc/make.conf CC=gcc CXX=g++ CPP=gcpp Note: that will change the compiler used for ALL ports, as well as k

Can't compile lxpanel

2013-06-05 Thread Walter Hurry
I'm running 10.0-CORRENT on amd64. Ports and source are both up to date. When I try to compile x11/lxpanel I get this: -- gmake[4]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11/lxpanel/work/lxpanel-0.5.12/ src/plugins/volume' CC volume_la-volume.lo volume.c:19