On 11/11/13 18:22, Julian Elischer wrote:
On 11/11/13, 1:32 PM, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
On 11/11/13 15:19, Teske, Devin wrote:
Topic: Lenovo Laptops and bsdinstall zfsboot with MBR layout...
Should we do the quick patch to change the default
from /boot/boot0 to /boot/mbr:
Index: zfsboot
=
code
3. boot0
Unifying 1 and 2 would help a lot -- I don't know of any reason we
need both except for tradition. #3 is probably best done as a
post-install config step ("Install FreeBSD boot manager" or
something), which also means it works for UFS systems.
-Nathan
___
a lot -- I don't know of any reason we
need both except for tradition. #3 is probably best done as a
post-install config step ("Install FreeBSD boot manager" or
something), which also means it works for UFS systems.
-Nathan
___
freeb
e selection menu.
>>>>>> I'd like to take my time in making sure Allan and I design
>>>>>> a worthy bootcode selection menu.
>>>>> This patch looks good (I don't remember why it was boot0 in the first
>>>>> place). I thin
ve three kinds of boot code:
1. ZFS boot code
2. UFS boot code
3. boot0
Unifying 1 and 2 would help a lot -- I don't know of any reason we need both except for
tradition. #3 is probably best done as a post-install config step ("Install FreeBSD
boot manager" or something), which
to know if making the diff purely negative
>>> still works.
>>>
>>> On another note, I think we should move away from a selector. Right now, we
>>> have three kinds of boot code:
>>> 1. ZFS boot code
>>> 2. UFS boot code
>>> 3. boot0
d help a lot -- I don't know of any reason we need both except for
tradition. #3 is probably best done as a post-install config step ("Install FreeBSD
boot manager" or something), which also means it works for UFS systems.
Well, I'm sensitive to the fact that sysinstall offe
part automatically installs something like /boot/mbr by
>> default, so I'd be interested to know if making the diff purely negative
>> still works.
>>
>> On another note, I think we should move away from a selector. Right now, we
>> have three kinds of boot code
still works.
>
> On another note, I think we should move away from a selector. Right now, we
> have three kinds of boot code:
> 1. ZFS boot code
> 2. UFS boot code
> 3. boot0
>
> Unifying 1 and 2 would help a lot -- I don't know of any reason we need both
> excep
interested to know if making the diff purely
>>> negative still works.
>>>
>>> On another note, I think we should move away from a selector. Right
>>> now, we have three kinds of boot code:
>>> 1. ZFS boot code
>>> 2. UFS boot code
>>> 3. boot
ot -- I don't know of any reason we
need both except for tradition. #3 is probably best done as a
post-install config step ("Install FreeBSD boot manager" or
something), which also means it works for UFS systems.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-curre
ely
> negative still works.
>
> On another note, I think we should move away from a selector. Right
> now, we have three kinds of boot code:
> 1. ZFS boot code
> 2. UFS boot code
> 3. boot0
>
> Unifying 1 and 2 would help a lot -- I don't know of any reason we
>
probably best done as a post-install
config step ("Install FreeBSD boot manager" or something), which also
means it works for UFS systems.
-Nathan
___
freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freeb
Lenovo laptops for the next
> release until I finish up the bootcode selection menu.
> I'd like to take my time in making sure Allan and I design
> a worthy bootcode selection menu.
These seems like the best approach for now, based on the feedback I have
gotten from people wit
Topic: Lenovo Laptops and bsdinstall zfsboot with MBR layout...
Should we do the quick patch to change the default
from /boot/boot0 to /boot/mbr:
Index: zfsboot
===
--- zfsboot (revision 258016)
+++ zfsboot (working copy)
@@
On Fri, 9 Jun 2000, John Hengstler wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> What is the quick way to restore the boot manager (dual os). Lost it when I
> reloaded Win98.
man boot0cfg
Doug White| FreeBSD: The Power to Serve
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | www.FreeBSD.org
To Unsub
Greetings,
What is the quick way to restore the boot manager (dual os). Lost it when I
reloaded Win98.
Have 4.0 CD, machine running 5.0-current.
John Hengstler
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
ÓÒ , 30 ÉÀÎ 1999, Thomas Dean ÎÁÐÉÓÁÌ:
> I installed -current on a notebook with WINNT on the disk. The
> notebook has the ide disk limitation. So, I chopped the disk do get
> around it. Maybe I should buy a new notebook, but, this one works.
>
> Everything worked OK, except t
In the last episode (Jun 29), Thomas Dean said:
> I installed -current on a notebook with WINNT on the disk. The
> notebook has the ide disk limitation. So, I chopped the disk do get
> around it. Maybe I should buy a new notebook, but, this one works.
>
> Everything worked OK,
On 30-Jun-99 Thomas Dean wrote:
> I installed -current on a notebook with WINNT on the disk. The
> notebook has the ide disk limitation. So, I chopped the disk do get
> around it. Maybe I should buy a new notebook, but, this one works.
>
> Everything worked OK, except the b
I installed -current on a notebook with WINNT on the disk. The
notebook has the ide disk limitation. So, I chopped the disk do get
around it. Maybe I should buy a new notebook, but, this one works.
Everything worked OK, except the boot manager. I get:
F1 ??
F2 FreeBSD
F3 ??
F4
21 matches
Mail list logo
