Re: HEADS UP, bind update shortly...

1999-11-29 Thread Nate Williams
> I'm about to import bind 8.2.2.p5 into src/contrib/bind and fix up the > broken parts of the tree as I go. I will disable the named (and associated > tools) build for the duration. If you want to do some make worlds or > releases in the next 8 hours or so, do a cvsup pronto! Thanks Peter! N

Re: HEADS UP, bind update shortly...

1999-11-29 Thread Peter Wemm
Peter Wemm wrote: > I'm about to import bind 8.2.2.p5 into src/contrib/bind and fix up the > broken parts of the tree as I go. I will disable the named (and associated > tools) build for the duration. If you want to do some make worlds or > releases in the next 8 hours or so, do a cvsup pronto!

HEADS UP, bind update shortly...

1999-11-29 Thread Peter Wemm
I'm about to import bind 8.2.2.p5 into src/contrib/bind and fix up the broken parts of the tree as I go. I will disable the named (and associated tools) build for the duration. If you want to do some make worlds or releases in the next 8 hours or so, do a cvsup pronto! Cheers, -Peter To Unsu

Re: BIND update

1999-11-17 Thread Warner Losh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> TrouBle writes: : just a quick note, where do i find the information needed about the bind : problem i face in 3.3-RELEASE if any ?? You can find it at the BIND web site. FreeBSD has Bind 8.1.2. - From the chart at http

Re: BIND update

1999-11-17 Thread Warner Losh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Ben Rosengart writes: : I'd be happier if you said the message was *from* the security officer. :-) I am the security officer. :-) That's why I get the secuirty-officer's mail :-). I've not verified the information by inspecti

Re: BIND update

1999-11-17 Thread Ben Rosengart
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Forrest Aldrich writes: > : So wouldn't be the impact if a server was compromized in the absence > : of an available fix :) > > A message to the security officer indicated that we don't have the > root hole in -current or -

Re: BIND update

1999-11-17 Thread Warner Losh
In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Forrest Aldrich writes: : So wouldn't be the impact if a server was compromized in the absence : of an available fix :) A message to the security officer indicated that we don't have the root hole in -current or -stable, but are vulnerable to the DoS attacks. Warne

Re: BIND update

1999-11-16 Thread Forrest Aldrich
So wouldn't be the impact if a server was compromized in the absence of an available fix :) At 02:46 PM 11/16/99 +0800, Peter Wemm wrote: >Ben Rosengart wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > > > > Will we be updating 4.0-current to the latest BIND-8.22-P5? > > > > Or -stable

Re: BIND update

1999-11-15 Thread Peter Wemm
Ben Rosengart wrote: > On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > > > Will we be updating 4.0-current to the latest BIND-8.22-P5? > > Or -stable for that matter? I believe these changes are eminently > qualified, being bugfixes. The changes are most definately not "just" bugfixes. The imp

Re: BIND update

1999-11-15 Thread Ben Rosengart
On Mon, 15 Nov 1999, Forrest Aldrich wrote: > Will we be updating 4.0-current to the latest BIND-8.22-P5? Or -stable for that matter? I believe these changes are eminently qualified, being bugfixes. -- Ben Rosengart UNIX Systems Engineer, Skunk Group StarMedia Network, Inc. To Unsubscrib

BIND update

1999-11-15 Thread Forrest Aldrich
Will we be updating 4.0-current to the latest BIND-8.22-P5? _F To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message