Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread John Baldwin
On 01-Mar-02 David Wolfskill wrote: >>Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:47:09 +0900 >>From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > >>At Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:17 + (UTC), >>John Baldwin wrote: >>> That's bad juju panic. :) Are you using witness? If so, did you get a >>> printf >>> about sleeping with a

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:17 + (UTC), John Baldwin wrote: > That's bad juju panic. :) Are you using witness? If so, did you get a printf > about sleeping with a lock held? I forgot to mention, I'm using WITNESS and WITNESS_SKIPSPIN options. -- Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC,

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread Michael Nottebrock
David Wolfskill wrote: >>Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:47:09 +0900 >>From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> > >>At Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:17 + (UTC), >>John Baldwin wrote: >> >>>That's bad juju panic. :) Are you using witness? If so, did you get a printf >>>about sleeping with a lock held? >>

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2002 10:47:09 +0900 >From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >At Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:17 + (UTC), >John Baldwin wrote: >> That's bad juju panic. :) Are you using witness? If so, did you get a printf >> about sleeping with a lock held? >I think I did not get lock warning

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Fri, 1 Mar 2002 01:34:17 + (UTC), John Baldwin wrote: > That's bad juju panic. :) Are you using witness? If so, did you get a printf > about sleeping with a lock held? I think I did not get lock warning just before this assertion failure. But on my environment, I got this lock order rev

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread John Baldwin
On 01-Mar-02 Jun Kuriyama wrote: > At Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:10:25 + (UTC), > David Wolfskill wrote: >> >Sorry, I forgot to get kernel core for this (today's -current)... >> >> >panic: Assertion td->td_proc->p_stat == SRUN || td->td_proc->p_stat == >> >SZOMB || td->td_proc->p_stat == SSTOP fail

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread Jun Kuriyama
At Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:10:25 + (UTC), David Wolfskill wrote: > >Sorry, I forgot to get kernel core for this (today's -current)... > > >panic: Assertion td->td_proc->p_stat == SRUN || td->td_proc->p_stat == SZOMB || >td->td_proc->p_stat == SSTOP failed at ../../../kern/kern_mutex.c:126 > > I

Re: Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread David Wolfskill
>Date: Thu, 28 Feb 2002 22:51:02 +0900 >From: Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sorry, I forgot to get kernel core for this (today's -current)... >panic: Assertion td->td_proc->p_stat == SRUN || td->td_proc->p_stat == SZOMB || >td->td_proc->p_stat == SSTOP failed at ../../../kern/kern_mutex.c:1

Assertion faild at kern_mutex.c

2002-02-28 Thread Jun Kuriyama
Sorry, I forgot to get kernel core for this (today's -current)... panic: Assertion td->td_proc->p_stat == SRUN || td->td_proc->p_stat == SZOMB || td->td_proc->p_stat == SSTOP failed at ../../../kern/kern_mutex.c:126 -- Jun Kuriyama <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> // IMG SRC, Inc. <[EMAIL PR