"Jordan K. Hubbard" wrote:
> You can always have verbosity as a selective option. We're talking
> about what to do for the great majority of users who aren't in your
> shoes at all and don't want to be.
True, although the messages (OK, admitadly not the ones we're talking about at
the moment) a
It seems Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
>
> > Also, I suspect having acd in the kernel and wcd in MAKEDEV may
> > lead to confusion for some people.
>
> I was under the impression that Soren was going to rename acd to wcd
> before the branch.
Oops, forgot about that one...
In fact I was going to add B
> ... and add a magic key combination to turn on the verbose flag.
gdb -kW :-)
- Jordan
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majord...@freebsd.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Chris Tubutis wrote:
> > Coming from someone who's spent the best part of last week trying to
> > diagnose
> > various hardware & software problems on NT & Win'95 machines (to almost no
> > avail), I'd appreciate as much verbosity being left _in_ the kernel &
> > FreeBSD
> >
> Coming from someone who's spent the best part of last week trying to diagnose
> various hardware & software problems on NT & Win'95 machines (to almost no
> avail), I'd appreciate as much verbosity being left _in_ the kernel & FreeBSD
You can always have verbosity as a selective option. We're t
From: Jordan K. Hubbard
>I don't like this error much either (especially since it generates
>tech support questions on USENET and other places from users going
>"Aieee! What does this mean?!")
me too
Question is what to do about the messages. I can think of a few options:
1. move them to verbo
On Sun, 17 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> > Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
>
> I don't like this error much either (especially since it generates
> tech support questions on USENET and other places from users going
> "Aieee! What does this mean?!") but I was overrul
Karl Pielorz wrote:
>
> Coming from someone who's spent the best part of last week trying to diagnose
> various hardware & software problems on NT & Win'95 machines (to almost no
> avail), I'd appreciate as much verbosity being left _in_ the kernel & FreeBSD
> as possible... I'm fed up with seeing
> Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
I don't like this error much either (especially since it generates
tech support questions on USENET and other places from users going
"Aieee! What does this mean?!") but I was overruled on the issue by
arguments that it was still providing
In message <36a24f91.478b5...@tdx.co.uk>, Karl Pielorz writes:
>jack wrote:
>
>> Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
>>
>> Perhaps `|| 1' could be changed to `|| crs->openings < some
>> critical number' in cam_xpt.c. As it is now a boy and a wolf
>> come to mind.
>
>Coming from
jack wrote:
> Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
>
> Perhaps `|| 1' could be changed to `|| crs->openings < some
> critical number' in cam_xpt.c. As it is now a boy and a wolf
> come to mind.
Coming from someone who's spent the best part of last week trying to diagnose
variou
sth...@nethelp.no wrote:
> > > j...@zippy-> dmesg|grep Freeing
> > > Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11.
> > > Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
> >
> > Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
>
> Agreed. They are confusing to those who don't know what i
> > j...@zippy-> dmesg|grep Freeing
> > Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11.
> > Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
>
> Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
Agreed. They are confusing to those who don't know what it means. As for
me, I just ignore them
On Sat, 16 Jan 1999, Jordan K. Hubbard wrote:
> j...@zippy-> dmesg|grep Freeing
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11.
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Nowhere near as annoying as "tagged openings now xx".
Perhaps `|| 1' could be changed to `|| crs->openings < some
Hi,
> j...@zippy-> dmesg|grep Freeing
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11.
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
> Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 9.
> Free
j...@zippy-> dmesg|grep Freeing
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 11.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 10.
Freeing (NOT implemented) redirected ISA irq 9.
Freeing (NOT implemente
16 matches
Mail list logo
