Re: About stscasestr() prototyped with string.h of current lib

2001-11-02 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 22:01:13 +0900, Hajimu UMEMOTO wrote: > I think nin said that having strcasestr() in our standard header > breaks existing program. Existen programs must be ported to FreeBSD first. > That is, our header seems not confirm > standard. Use #define _ANSI_SOURCE or _POSI

Re: About stscasestr() prototyped with string.h of current lib

2001-11-02 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 05:50:07 -0500, Thomas David Rivers wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 17:36:04 +0900, NINOMIYA Hideyuki wrote: > > > > > In implementation with current, even if you implemented it for the > > > reason that Linux included, there is the problem that behavior is > > > d

Re: About stscasestr() prototyped with string.h of current lib

2001-11-02 Thread Hajimu UMEMOTO
Hi, > On Fri, 2 Nov 2001 12:01:19 +0300 > "Andrey A. Chernov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: ache> On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 17:36:04 +0900, NINOMIYA Hideyuki wrote: > In implementation with current, even if you implemented it for the > reason that Linux included, there is the problem that beh

Re: About stscasestr() prototyped with string.h of current lib

2001-11-02 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 17:36:04 +0900, NINOMIYA Hideyuki wrote: > In implementation with current, even if you implemented it for the > reason that Linux included, there is the problem that behavior is > different from Linux in about prototyping reference. 1) Our strcasestr() implementation is n

About stscasestr() prototyped with string.h of current lib

2001-11-02 Thread NINOMIYA Hideyuki
Hello # please Cc: to me in reply time. because, i doesn't subscribe # in to hackers and current. There is a little problem in ports build on current, and I send an email to you with its having been the function that you committed to because the cause seemed to be lib function of current. inclu