Monday, September 8, 2003, 11:48:55 AM, you wrote:
Sl> DOH! things are not going weel this morning, this patch should be right:
Tested your patch, but it's exactly the same as before.
--
Alex Dupre [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.alexdupre.com/ [EMAIL PROTE
Monday, September 8, 2003, 11:48:55 AM, you wrote:
Sl> DOH! things are not going weel this morning, this patch should be right:
I didn't try your patch, yet, but I can report some other phantom
drives with ataNG. The system is still the net4501 board.
With Sandisk 32MB CF:
ata0-master: pio=0x09
> "YazzY" == YazzY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
YazzY> Isn't the ATAng code great? It makes it affordable to get a
YazzY> 9007199253773098MB CF for the price of a 32 MB card. Now I am
YazzY> taking backups of the internet on it. :)
Pocket internet... now there's a product.
Dave.
--
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 21:38, Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems Soren Schmidt wrote:
> > It seems YazzY wrote:
> > > Hi.
> > >
> > > It can be mounted when I boot the laptop and do not take the card out of
> > > the slot.
> > > If I eject it and then put it back in, I cannot mount it or dd files to
It seems Soren Schmidt wrote:
> Forget that, wrong patch, here goes the right one:
DOH! things are not going weel this morning, this patch should be right:
Index: ata-lowlevel.c
===
RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/dev/ata/ata-lowlevel.c
It seems Soren Schmidt wrote:
> It seems YazzY wrote:
> > Hi.
> >
> > It can be mounted when I boot the laptop and do not take the card out of
> > the slot.
> > If I eject it and then put it back in, I cannot mount it or dd files to
> > it anymore...
> > Anyway, this bit of dmesg does not look h
On Mon, Sep 08, 2003 at 05:30:28AM +0200, YazzY wrote:
>Isn't the ATAng code great?
>It makes it affordable to get a 9007199253773098MB CF for the price of a
> 32 MB card.
>Now I am taking backups of the internet on it.
>:)
The old ATA code (in -stable) can only manage to expand my 3102MB disk
to
It seems YazzY wrote:
> Hi.
>
> It can be mounted when I boot the laptop and do not take the card out of
> the slot.
> If I eject it and then put it back in, I cannot mount it or dd files to
> it anymore...
> Anyway, this bit of dmesg does not look healthy to me. And as I said,
> everything wor
Isn't the ATAng code great?
It makes it affordable to get a 9007199253773098MB CF for the price of a
32 MB card.
Now I am taking backups of the internet on it.
:)
M. Warner Losh wrote:
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Dou
In message: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Bruce Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
: On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
: > On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Martin Jessa wrote:
: > > ad4: 9007199253773098MB
<\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-P\M-
Hi.
It can be mounted when I boot the laptop and do not take the card out of
the slot.
If I eject it and then put it back in, I cannot mount it or dd files to
it anymore...
Anyway, this bit of dmesg does not look healthy to me. And as I said,
everything worked fine before the ATAng code got cha
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Doug White wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Martin Jessa wrote:
>
> > The latest changes in ATAng code made it impossible to use my CF cards.
> > I have a few of them which previously worked just fine.
> > Now, each time I put one to my laptop's PCMCIA slot i get following errors:
On Sun, 7 Sep 2003, Martin Jessa wrote:
> The latest changes in ATAng code made it impossible to use my CF cards.
> I have a few of them which previously worked just fine.
> Now, each time I put one to my laptop's PCMCIA slot i get following errors:
Looks like it mounted fine to me; some of the s
Hi.
The latest changes in ATAng code made it impossible to use my CF cards.
I have a few of them which previously worked just fine.
Now, each time I put one to my laptop's PCMCIA slot i get following errors:
pccard0: Allocation failed for cfe 0
ata2: at port 0x110-0x11f irq 11 function 0 config
14 matches
Mail list logo
