Neil Blakey-Milner wrote:
>
> I think it is probably sufficiently free. It doesn't sufficiently cover
> the use of small bits of its code, though. It is a non-terminating
> license.
I've studied it carefully a couple of times, and haven't found anything at
all wrong with it. It is about the s
Garance A Drosihn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Note that there will still be a commercial AFS offering, and
> this new open-source AFS option. The open-source one will
> not include some things from the commercial package. I am
> not sure what things will be missing.
>
On Wed 2000-08-30 (13:47), Robert Watson wrote:
> Transarc/IBM source will presumably greatly facilitate the development of
> Arla, and also allow use of the IBM code in the mean time (Arla is under a
> liberal BSD-style license, whereas I would guess the IBM code will be
> under something like th
om/developerworks/opensource
along with some other info about the availability of open-source AFS.
DISCLAIMER: While I work for IBM and also happen to be at Transarc, I
have nothing at all to do with AFS. So don't ask me, I didn't do it...
:-)
To Unsubscribe: send mail to [EMA
IS Labs at Network Associates, Safeport Network Services
On Wed, 30 Aug 2000, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>
>
> Just F.Y.I
>
> I understand that, today, IBM is announcing it will open-source
> AFS via the IBM Public Source license..
>
> Some quotes I've seen:
&g
At 11:30 AM -0400 8/30/00, Thomas David Rivers wrote:
>Just F.Y.I
>
> I understand that, today, IBM is announcing it will open-source
>AFS via the IBM Public Source license..
>
> Some quotes I've seen:
>
>"IBM announced today the open source contribution
Just F.Y.I
I understand that, today, IBM is announcing it will open-source
AFS via the IBM Public Source license..
Some quotes I've seen:
"IBM announced today the open source contribution of a high-performance file
system technology and talent to strengthen collaborat
