Re: A question about max_uid

2001-05-01 Thread Robert Watson
Note that you have to be careful to avoid the value of VNOVAL (-1) for a uid or a gid, or you'll run into trouble with the VFS layer; this is arguably due to poor design of VFS. NFSv2 also had problems with reserved values (as the NFSv2 interface greatly resembles the VFS interface, for the obvi

Re: A question about max_uid

2001-04-30 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Tue, 01 May 2001 06:56:56 +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > Hello, > chpass: updating the database... > pwd_mkdb: 2147483647 > recommended max uid value (65535) Gee, that message looks familiar. ;-) The warning was a concession that I implemented after discussions with BDE. The way we want

Re: A question about max_uid

2001-04-30 Thread Yoshihiro Koya
Hello, From: Sheldon Hearn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: A question about max_uid Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:35:50 +0200 > On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:15:55 +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > > > Currently, I have nobody (uid = 65534) account as a default account on > > m

Re: A question about max_uid

2001-04-30 Thread Sheldon Hearn
On Fri, 27 Apr 2001 00:15:55 +0900, Yoshihiro Koya wrote: > Currently, I have nobody (uid = 65534) account as a default account on > my box. It might be easy to guess that the maximum is greater than > 65533. My question is why such a restricion still remains. >From what I remember from my

A question about max_uid

2001-04-26 Thread Yoshihiro Koya
Hello, I found the following in the man page of pw(8). > -u min,max, -i min,max > These options set the minimum and maximum user and group > ids allocated for new accounts and groups created by pw. > The default values for each is 1000 minimum and 32000 ma