Re: 5.1 setfacl problem

2003-07-20 Thread Robert Watson
On Sun, 20 Jul 2003, Branko F. Gracnar wrote: > >specify what POSIX.1e considers an incomplete ACL and rejects. Try using: > > > > setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o::rx,u:some_user:rwx,m:rwx test_directory Looks like you might have some typos: > # setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o:rx,g:some_group:rwx,m:rwx

Re: 5.1 setfacl problem

2003-07-20 Thread Branko F. Gracnar
>specify what POSIX.1e considers an incomplete ACL and rejects. Try using: > > setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o::rx,u:some_user:rwx,m:rwx test_directory # setfacl -dm u::rwx,g::rx,o:rx,g:some_group:rwx,m:rwx test_directory setfacl: acl_from_text() failed: Invalid argument ... Brane _

Re: 5.1 setfacl problem

2003-07-19 Thread Robert Watson
On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, [iso-8859-2] Branko F. Graènar wrote: > Hi there! > > I'm running 5.1 on i386 platform and i have silly problem with acls. > > I have disks mounted with acl option (ofcourse they are formatted with > ufs2) and acls generally work okay. > > But when i try to set default

5.1 setfacl problem

2003-07-19 Thread Branko F . Gračnar
Hi there! I'm running 5.1 on i386 platform and i have silly problem with acls. I have disks mounted with acl option (ofcourse they are formatted with ufs2) and acls generally work okay. But when i try to set default directory acl entry i get 'Invalid argument' error. Here is example command us