On 09/09/2021 00:04, Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
devel/ninja/Makefile has USES= python in it, so it maybe require python
to run or at least build.
You could probably remove that line without anyone noticing. Ninja uses
Python for precisely one thing (or, at least, did last time I looked):
There is
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 5:06 PM Tomoaki AOKI wrote:
> On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:32:16 -0600
> Warner Losh wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 6:33 AM David Chisnall
> wrote:
> >
> > > On 08/09/2021 11:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > > Seems to me that there was an earlier mail about getting CMAKE to
> w
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 14:32:16 -0600
Warner Losh wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 6:33 AM David Chisnall wrote:
>
> > On 08/09/2021 11:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > > Seems to me that there was an earlier mail about getting CMAKE to work
> > > with FreeBSD builds. Could be worthwhile to look into ge
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 6:33 AM David Chisnall wrote:
> On 08/09/2021 11:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
> > Seems to me that there was an earlier mail about getting CMAKE to work
> > with FreeBSD builds. Could be worthwhile to look into getting ninja
> > to work also. But I could understand that there
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021, 6:52 AM Stefan Esser wrote:
> Am 08.09.21 um 10:57 schrieb David Chisnall:
> > On 07/09/2021 18:02, Stefan Esser wrote:
> >> Wouldn't this break META_MODE?
> >
> > I have never managed to get META_MODE to work but my understanding is
> that
> > META_MODE is addressing a probl
Am 08.09.21 um 10:57 schrieb David Chisnall:
> On 07/09/2021 18:02, Stefan Esser wrote:
>> Wouldn't this break META_MODE?
>
> I have never managed to get META_MODE to work but my understanding is that
> META_MODE is addressing a problem that doesn't really exist in any other build
> system that I'
On Wed, Sep 8, 2021 at 2:59 AM David Chisnall wrote:
> On 07/09/2021 18:02, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > Wouldn't this break META_MODE?
>
> I have never managed to get META_MODE to work but my understanding is
> that META_MODE is addressing a problem that doesn't really exist in any
> other build syst
On 08/09/2021 11:52, Gary Jennejohn wrote:
Seems to me that there was an earlier mail about getting CMAKE to work
with FreeBSD builds. Could be worthwhile to look into getting ninja
to work also. But I could understand that there might be push-back,
since the project prefers to use utilities fr
On Wed, 8 Sep 2021 09:57:50 +0100
David Chisnall wrote:
> On 07/09/2021 18:02, Stefan Esser wrote:
> > Wouldn't this break META_MODE?
>
> I have never managed to get META_MODE to work but my understanding
> is that META_MODE is addressing a problem that doesn't really exist
> in any other buil
On 07/09/2021 18:02, Stefan Esser wrote:
Wouldn't this break META_MODE?
I have never managed to get META_MODE to work but my understanding is
that META_MODE is addressing a problem that doesn't really exist in any
other build system that I've used: that dependencies are not properly
tracked.
> From: David Chisnall
> Date: Tue, 7 Sep 2021 14:51:21 +0100
> On 06/09/2021 20:34, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
> > With the option WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes the world build time is 2.5
> > times faster (real or user+sys), down from 48 min to 19.5 min real
> > time.
>
> Note that building LLVM with th
Am 07.09.21 um 15:51 schrieb David Chisnall:
> On 06/09/2021 20:34, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
>> With the option WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes the world build time is 2.5
>> times faster (real or user+sys), down from 48 min to 19.5 min real
>> time.
>
> Note that building LLVM with the upstream CMake + Nin
On Tue, 7 Sep 2021, at 13:51, David Chisnall wrote:
> One of the things I'd love to prototype if I had time is a CMake-based
> build system for FreeBSD so that we could get all of the tooling
> integration from the compile_commands.json, reuse LLVM's (and any other
> contrib things that use CMak
On 06/09/2021 20:34, Wolfram Schneider wrote:
With the option WITHOUT_TOOLCHAIN=yes the world build time is 2.5
times faster (real or user+sys), down from 48 min to 19.5 min real
time.
Note that building LLVM with the upstream CMake + Ninja build system is
*significantly* faster on a decent mu
Van: David Chisnall
Datum: maandag, 6 september 2021 11:43
Aan: freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Onderwerp: Re: -CURRENT compilation time
On 06/09/2021 09:08, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Compiling C++ seems
> extremely CPU heavy and this is made worse by the fact LLVM is built
> twice (once
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 11:44, David Chisnall wrote:
>
> On 06/09/2021 09:08, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Compiling C++ seems
> > extremely CPU heavy and this is made worse by the fact LLVM is built
> > twice (once for build/cross tools, once for the actual world).
>
> Note that you need to build LLV
On Mon, 6 Sept 2021 at 10:10, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>
> Hey,
>
> I want to build -CURRENT again from sources. It's been a long time
> since I hadn't done that. I'm shocked by the compilation time.
>
> I started the whole thing on Friday night and Monday morning it's
> still in stage 4.2 (building
On Mon, 6 Sep 2021 10:43:06 +0100, David Chisnall wrote:
> On 06/09/2021 09:08, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Compiling C++ seems
> > extremely CPU heavy and this is made worse by the fact LLVM is built
> > twice (once for build/cross tools, once for the actual world).
>
> Note that you need to b
On 06/09/2021 09:08, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Compiling C++ seems
extremely CPU heavy and this is made worse by the fact LLVM is built
twice (once for build/cross tools, once for the actual world).
Note that you need to build LLVM twice only if you are actively
debugging LLVM reproduceable deploy
On 06/09/21 10:08, Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
Hey,
I want to build -CURRENT again from sources. It's been a long time
since I hadn't done that. I'm shocked by the compilation time.
I started the whole thing on Friday night and Monday morning it's
still in stage 4.2 (building libraries). Through occa
Jeremie,
a few observations (from the POV of someone who builds current ~ once a
month)
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 10:09 AM Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> I want to build -CURRENT again from sources. It's been a long time
> since I hadn't done that. I'm shocked by the compilation time.
>
> I star
Hey,
I want to build -CURRENT again from sources. It's been a long time
since I hadn't done that. I'm shocked by the compilation time.
I started the whole thing on Friday night and Monday morning it's
still in stage 4.2 (building libraries). Through occasional glancing
at the screen over the week
22 matches
Mail list logo
