On Wed, 28 May 2003 11:00:25 -0700 (PDT)
Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> > some appropriate option.
>
> Thank you for the patch. Since we are only days away from a release, I
> would like to avoid using the new dynamic
On Thu, 29 May 2003, Takayoshi Kochi wrote:
> I'm still studying the reason why the TABLE_ID_DSDT is removed
> in recent ACPI CA, but at least you should remove all TABLE_ID_DSDT's,
> I think.
>
> Also, ACPI_FIRST_METHOD_ID should be larger than 0,
> otherwise 0 may be allocated to running method a
From: Takayoshi Kochi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 01:23:49 +0900 (JST)
> Attached is the patch and should apply to the FreeBSD tree with
> some appropriate option.
Oops, I attached a wrong one. Pleas
Hi,
From: Nate Lawson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: [acpi-jp 2267] Re: HEADSUP: acpi patches in the tree
Date: Tue, 27 May 2003 16:58:59 -0700
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> >
>
On Tue, May 27, 2003 at 05:25:27PM -0700, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Tue, 27 May 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> > >
> > > acpi0: on motherboard
> > > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\
On Tue, 27 May 2003, Nate Lawson wrote:
> On Wed, 28 May 2003, Shin-ichi YOSHIMOTO wrote:
> > After this update, I found some error messages like this:
> >
> > acpi0: on motherboard
> > ACPI-0438: *** Error: Looking up [\\_OS_] in namespace, AE_NOT_FOUND
> > ACPI-1287: *** Error: Method ex
